From: Eric Whiting <ewhiting@amis.com>
To: Jason Holmes <jholmes@psu.edu>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:08:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB2AF7B.B7FDC8AC@amis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3FB27670.4C878A84@psu.edu
Jason Holmes wrote:
>
<snip>
> I'm
> already seeing some odd performance differences between the 2.4.22
> client and the 2.6.0-test9-mm1 client (both against a 2.6.0-test9-mm2
> server):
Similar observations here. Our users have reported NFS slowdowns of 10x on
2.6.0-test6-mm4 nfs clients compared to the same box and setup running 2.4.22.
Something is goofy in 2.6.0-test6-mm4 that has a bad effect on NFS client
performance.
eric
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-12 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-12 18:05 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 20:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 20:51 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 21:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 21:33 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 1:20 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 2:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 14:16 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 21:55 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-14 0:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-14 18:37 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-14 21:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-16 15:54 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 15:56 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 17:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 18:59 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:09 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 19:18 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 22:08 ` Eric Whiting [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-13 19:42 Duc Vianney
2003-11-13 20:02 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB2AF7B.B7FDC8AC@amis.com \
--to=ewhiting@amis.com \
--cc=jholmes@psu.edu \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.