Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance

[Jason Holmes <jholmes@psu.edu>]

Eric Whiting wrote:
> 
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> >      > This is not the same test, nor the same results as Jason's, but
> >      > here is some more data from bonnie and dd tests.This shows some
> >      > write performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6 eric
> >
> > How about vs. 2.4.23?
> 
> 2.4.23 looks good -- see below -- these are acceptable numbers for a 100M
> network. I reran the 2.6.0-test6-mm4 benchmarks and it still is much slower than
> the the 2.4.23.
> 
> Question for Jason: -- are you running the 4/4 vm layout in your kernel? My
> 2.6.0-test6-mm4 has the 4/4 vm enabled -- which can have an impact on
> performance. I'll tetest with 2.6.0-test9 without the mm1 and 4/4 vm enabled.

Nope.  I'm just doing normal 4GB highmem.

Thanks,

--
Jason Holmes


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs