* pom for 2.6
@ 2003-12-08 19:34 Laurens Blankers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laurens Blankers @ 2003-12-08 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello,
This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
2.6?
The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.
Laurens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* pom for 2.6
@ 2003-12-09 9:55 Laurens Blankers
2003-12-09 10:27 ` Antony Stone
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laurens Blankers @ 2003-12-09 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello,
This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
2.6?
The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.
Laurens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pom for 2.6
2003-12-09 9:55 Laurens Blankers
@ 2003-12-09 10:27 ` Antony Stone
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2003-12-09 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 9:55 am, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
> can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
> 2.6?
>
> The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
> nice to have a pom for it when it is released.
Try asking the developers list - they're more likely to be involved with
getting pom ready for 2.6.
Antony.
--
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting against the two most destructive forces in the universe:
entropy and human stupidity. They're not things you can always
overcome with a "methodology" or on a schedule.
- Damian Conway, Perl God
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* pom for 2.6
@ 2003-12-09 12:25 Laurens Blankers
2003-12-11 12:57 ` Harald Welte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laurens Blankers @ 2003-12-09 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi,
This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?
The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.
Laurens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pom for 2.6
2003-12-09 12:25 pom for 2.6 Laurens Blankers
@ 2003-12-11 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2003-12-11 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Harald Welte @ 2003-12-11 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurens Blankers; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
> mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
> here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?
SCNR: as soon as it is finished. jeez, I'm working on it.
> The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
> nice to have a pom for it when it is released.
yes, we are going to have it when 2.6.0 final is released.
> Laurens
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pom for 2.6
2003-12-11 12:57 ` Harald Welte
@ 2003-12-11 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2003-12-11 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harald Welte; +Cc: Laurens Blankers, netfilter-devel
Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Laurens Blankers wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
>>mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
>>here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?
>
>
> SCNR: as soon as it is finished. jeez, I'm working on it.
Harald, could you commit what you've got so far to CVS or maybe
create a list in bugzilla so people can see what remains to be done
and leave a note if they want to do some part of it ? I would very
likely do some parts of it.
Best regards,
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-11 13:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-09 12:25 pom for 2.6 Laurens Blankers
2003-12-11 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2003-12-11 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-09 9:55 Laurens Blankers
2003-12-09 10:27 ` Antony Stone
2003-12-08 19:34 Laurens Blankers
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.