pom for 2.6

pom for 2.6

[Laurens Blankers]

Hi,

This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?

The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.

Laurens

Re: pom for 2.6

[Harald Welte]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
> mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
> here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?

SCNR: as soon as it is finished.  jeez, I'm working on it.  

> The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
> nice to have a pom for it when it is released.

yes, we are going to have it when 2.6.0 final is released.

> Laurens

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: pom for 2.6

[Patrick McHardy]

Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>This question has been asked several times on the netfilter-user
>>mailinglist but I can find an answer to it, so therefor I'm asking it
>>here: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel 2.6?
> 
> 
> SCNR: as soon as it is finished.  jeez, I'm working on it.  

Harald, could you commit what you've got so far to CVS or maybe
create a list in bugzilla so people can see what remains to be done
and leave a note if they want to do some part of it ? I would very
likely do some parts of it.

Best regards,
Patrick

pom for 2.6

[Laurens Blankers]

Hello,

This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
2.6?

The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.

Laurens

Re: pom for 2.6

[Antony Stone]

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 9:55 am, Laurens Blankers wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
> can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
> 2.6?
>
> The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
> nice to have a pom for it when it is released.

Try asking the developers list - they're more likely to be involved with 
getting pom ready for 2.6.

Antony.

-- 
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting against the two most destructive forces in the universe:
entropy and human stupidity. They're not things you can always
overcome with a "methodology" or on a schedule.

 - Damian Conway, Perl God

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.

pom for 2.6

[Laurens Blankers]

Hello,

This question has been asked a number of times on this list already but I
can't find an answer to it: When can we expect a patch-o-matic for kernel
2.6?

The first final version of 2.6 is coming closer and it would be really
nice to have a pom for it when it is released.

Laurens