Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock

[Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>]

在 2019/11/16 下午3:03, Shakeel Butt 写道:
>> +reget_lruvec:
>> +               lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
>> +
>>                 /* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking */
>> -               if (!locked) {
>> -                       locked = compact_lock_irqsave(&pgdat->lru_lock,
>> -                                                               &flags, cc);
>> +               if (lruvec != locked_lruvec) {
>> +                       if (locked_lruvec) {
>> +                               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock,
>> +                                               locked_lruvec->irqflags);
>> +                               locked_lruvec = NULL;
>> +                       }
> What guarantees the lifetime of lruvec? You should read the comment on
> mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(). Have you seen the patches Hugh had shared?
> Please look at the  trylock_page_lruvec().
> 

Thanks for comments, Shakeel.

lruvec lifetime is same as memcg, which allocted in mem_cgroup_alloc()->alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info()
I have read Hugh's patchset, even not every lines. But what's point of you here?

> BTW have you tested Hugh's patches?
> 

yes, I have tried the case-lru-file-readtwice on my machine w/o containers, it show a bit more regression.

Thanks
Alex