* DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
@ 2004-03-01 14:00 Maggio
2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maggio @ 2004-03-01 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
Hi ,
I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound .
I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had any
problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of the
drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 versions of
the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't work anymore with
DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , and I can only use DXS
with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
What's up?
Thanks
Marcello
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
2004-03-01 14:00 DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx? Maggio
@ 2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-01 15:28 ` Maggio
2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2004-03-01 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maggio; +Cc: alsa-devel
At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:00:41 +0100,
Maggio wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
> DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
>
> I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound .
>
> I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had any
> problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of the
> drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 versions of
> the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't work anymore with
> DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , and I can only use DXS
> with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
>
> What's up?
i don't know - there are no big changes regarding this area.
if dxs_support=4 works for you, please send me the patch for dxs white
list.
Takashi
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
@ 2004-03-01 15:28 ` Maggio
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maggio @ 2004-03-01 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takashi Iwai, alsa-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Takashi Iwai wrote:
| At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:00:41 +0100, Maggio wrote:
|
|> Hi ,
|>
|> I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
|> DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
|>
|> I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound
|> .
|>
|> I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had
|> any problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of
|> the drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3
|> versions of the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't
|> work anymore with DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled ,
|> and I can only use DXS with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
|>
|> What's up?
|
|
| i don't know - there are no big changes regarding this area. if
| dxs_support=4 works for you, please send me the patch for dxs white
| list.
|
|
| Takashi
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is
| sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy
| apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from
| IBM. Click Now!
| http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
| _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing
| list Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
|
Ok , I've made the patch , but I continue to ask me why this
regression (on my board) from 0.9.8 to 1.0.2c/1.0.3.
Maybe some changes in snd-ac97-codec module? Or what? I've compared
the two diffs between 0.9.8 and 1.0.2/1.0.3 and there aren't very much
differences in snd-via82xx (primarly them don't seem related to the
problem) .
The patch is attached.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAQ1a2c/np+8AbwbcRAibsAJ4tcFGPJW0yjCoaNpdUNSZyA4gajgCdEwnq
oOldyoycxXiU9q4nGR8GHGA=
=fGY0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
2004-03-01 14:00 DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx? Maggio
2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
@ 2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
2004-03-01 15:38 ` Maggio
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Vlasov @ 2004-03-01 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1237 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:00:41PM +0100, Maggio wrote:
> I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
> DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
>
> I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound .
>
> I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had any
> problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of the
> drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 versions of
> the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't work anymore with
> DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , and I can only use DXS
> with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
>
> What's up?
I suspect that dxs_support=4 is really the correct value in most (if
not all) cases. The resampling engine in VT82xx has a register for
the source sample rate, but does not have any register to indicate
the destination sample rate. Unless the controller snoops the AC'97
accesses in some way, this probably means that the destination
sample rate is fixed at 48000 Hz. I'm not sure what really happens
when the codec is set to VRA mode in this case - probably this
depends on quirks of a particular codec. On my ASUS A7V8X (VT8235
and ALC650) both dxs_support=1 and dxs_support=4 seem to work
fine...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
@ 2004-03-01 15:38 ` Maggio
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maggio @ 2004-03-01 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Vlasov; +Cc: alsa-devel
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:00:41PM +0100, Maggio wrote:
>
>
>>I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
>>DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
>>
>>I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound .
>>
>>I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had any
>>problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of the
>>drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 versions of
>>the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't work anymore with
>>DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , and I can only use DXS
>>with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
>>
>>What's up?
>>
>>
>
>I suspect that dxs_support=4 is really the correct value in most (if
>not all) cases. The resampling engine in VT82xx has a register for
>the source sample rate, but does not have any register to indicate
>the destination sample rate. Unless the controller snoops the AC'97
>accesses in some way, this probably means that the destination
>sample rate is fixed at 48000 Hz. I'm not sure what really happens
>when the codec is set to VRA mode in this case - probably this
>depends on quirks of a particular codec. On my ASUS A7V8X (VT8235
>and ALC650) both dxs_support=1 and dxs_support=4 seem to work
>fine...
>
>
dxs_support=4 works well for me in any cases , with 0.9.8 I don't hear
(apparently) any difference between dxs_support=1 and dxs_support=4 ,
but with 1.0.2c/1.0.3 for me dxs_support=1 is pretty unusable , because
of garbaged sound . I've just noticed that if I enable first
dxs_support=4 , and then "rmmod" the driver , and then again reloading
the driver with dxs_support=1 I get garbaged sound also with 0.9.8 .
This is very obscure to me ...
I don't anyway completly understood how NO_VRA works and what this do ,
and what you lose what using NO_VRA instead of VRA .
Thanks
Marcello
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-01 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-01 14:00 DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx? Maggio
2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-01 15:28 ` Maggio
2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
2004-03-01 15:38 ` Maggio
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.