From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Matthias Andree <ma+rfs@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:35:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <408E99EB.6050203@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040426204037.GA21455@merlin.emma.line.org>
Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>If so, the whole discussion is about getting out of the frying pan and
>into the fire. The traditional approach will then be standards compliant
>but be out-of-band and outside of the file system name space, the new
>approach will be outside of the standards, requiring application
>developers to produce a Linux and a POSIX version.
>
>Or am I barking up the wrong tree?
>
>
>
There is always friction between standards and innovation. One should
comply with standards unless genuinely innovating.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 19:54 [PATCH] reiserfs v3 patches for 2.6.6-rc2 Chris Mason
2004-04-26 16:59 ` I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 17:31 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 18:15 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 19:12 ` Mark Hahn
2004-04-26 19:13 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 20:40 ` Matthias Andree
2004-04-26 22:20 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-26 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-27 17:35 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-04-27 18:00 ` mjt
2004-04-27 18:00 ` Markus Törnqvist
2004-04-26 19:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:29 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-28 0:10 ` Stefan Traby
2004-04-28 8:22 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-28 9:44 ` mjt
2004-04-28 12:45 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-29 11:35 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-28 16:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-04-27 18:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-28 5:51 ` Meelis Roos
2004-04-30 16:14 ` David Masover
2004-05-07 17:29 ` Lamont R. Peterson
2004-05-10 15:01 ` Hans Reiser
2004-05-02 4:14 ` Rob Landley
2004-04-26 19:56 ` Matt H.
2004-05-11 20:00 ` [PATCH] reiserfs v3 patches for 2.6.6-rc2 Mike Benoit
2004-05-11 21:08 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=408E99EB.6050203@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ma+rfs@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.