From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: lamont@gurulabs.com
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 08:01:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <409F9930.2040204@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083950982.2985.24.camel@wraith.lrp.advansoft.us>
Lamont R. Peterson wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:14, David Masover wrote:
>[SNIP]
>
>
>>I haven't run any benchmarks against "real" databases like mysql, but if
>>we want to talk about what V4 obsoletes, it obsoletes things which
>>haven't even been developed/released yet (WinFS on Longhorn).
>>
>>
>
>Microsoft has publicly postponed WinFS to the next version of Windows
>past Longhorn, which is not scheduled for release until 2010.
>
>
Um, no, they haven't postponed WinFS, and V4 is just a storage layer ---
no substantial new semantics. So actually we are behind (except that
our storage layer is way better than theirs) and have as yet no funding
to catch up. Probably after they ship someone will decide Linux needs
funding in this area.....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-10 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 19:54 [PATCH] reiserfs v3 patches for 2.6.6-rc2 Chris Mason
2004-04-26 16:59 ` I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 17:31 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 18:15 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-26 19:12 ` Mark Hahn
2004-04-26 19:13 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-26 20:40 ` Matthias Andree
2004-04-26 22:20 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-26 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-27 17:35 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 18:00 ` mjt
2004-04-27 18:00 ` Markus Törnqvist
2004-04-26 19:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:29 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-27 17:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-27 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-28 0:10 ` Stefan Traby
2004-04-28 8:22 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-28 9:44 ` mjt
2004-04-28 12:45 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-29 11:35 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-28 16:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-04-27 18:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-28 5:51 ` Meelis Roos
2004-04-30 16:14 ` David Masover
2004-05-07 17:29 ` Lamont R. Peterson
2004-05-10 15:01 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-05-02 4:14 ` Rob Landley
2004-04-26 19:56 ` Matt H.
2004-05-11 20:00 ` [PATCH] reiserfs v3 patches for 2.6.6-rc2 Mike Benoit
2004-05-11 21:08 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=409F9930.2040204@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=lamont@gurulabs.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.