Re: [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some

[pljosh <witek876@interia.pl>]

Ed Wildgoose wrote:

> Hmm, interesting.  Can you switch the order of your IP mappings around 
> on this test so that you can prove that it is some feature of HTB that 
> user1 always gets more bandwidth, and no something about that machine 
> (ie if you swap ip's for user1 and 3 that it still remains (the new) 
> user1 who gets all the b/w?
> 
> Obviously this should not be so, just curious to eliminate other 
> possibilities
> 
> Ed W

I did it already. When I set filter to direct 192.168.3.4 packets to 
1:60 and 192.168.3.6 to 1:40 then lines on my graph switch: now blue is 
over red...
The same switch happens when i set higher prio of 1:60...
So it means than when two classes at the same level have same "prio" 
then class with lower minor id has higher priority than classes with 
lower minor id... So there is no possibility to set them to be equal 
when borrowing occurs.

Now I am in trouble as I am writing my thesis and I wanted to show in my 
paper that HTB is excellent to share BW between users... what am I to 
write about this case?

BTW: maybe someone could repeat my experiment? Maybe it is something 
wrong with my hadrware or some unbelievable coincidence?

-josh


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/