All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pljosh <witek876@interia.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing?  *bug* in HTB or some
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:56:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D57B6A.7040309@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D21439.7000702@interia.pl>

U¿ytkownik Andy Furniss napisa³:
> I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get 
> the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I 

Did you launch it passing argument in "" or ''?
./rc.shape "4 5 6"
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4 5 6

> hardcoded my settings in it and checked with tc -s class ls dev eth0 
> that my 2 classes existed.

I dont get it: you prepared two classes for two PCs which is equivalent 
to "t5" on my graph which shows that HTB acts PERFECT in such conditions.

> I SCPd a file from gateway to 2 PCs and thay were shaped OK and came in 
> second perfect. It was the same for 500,1000 and 5000 ceils. The 500 
> test took 15 mins.
> So I don't really know whats going on for you.
> Andy.

Try the same using 3 classes and stress it with 2 PCs only (each class 
has rate=1/3 of max bw and ceil=max bw. You will se that first class 
will get from HTB almost TWICE as much as secound one one!

-josh

p.s.
I made same test on other network with other PCs and different kernel 
version and it was the same...

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-20 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-17 21:59 [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct me or maybe pljosh
2004-06-18  8:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 11:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some pljosh
2004-06-18 11:28 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 12:50 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 13:30 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 18:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 18:45 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 21:11 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 21:57 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19  4:05 ` pljosh
2004-06-19  4:14 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 11:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 11:56 ` pljosh [this message]
2004-06-20 13:12 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:18 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 15:06 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 16:02 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* confirmed? pljosh
2004-06-24  9:38 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-25  3:58 ` pljosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40D57B6A.7040309@interia.pl \
    --to=witek876@interia.pl \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.