From: pljosh <witek876@interia.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:45:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D33845.6020602@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D21439.7000702@interia.pl>
> I just tested with my script and also see a 5-8% advantage for the lower
> handle class.
>
> I wouldn't call it a bug though - HTB is written for high traffic setups
> and trade off needs to be made between perfect behaviour and CPU usage
> and you say it gets better with more classes.
>
> Andy.
Well - you had 5-8% while I noticed 50-80% difference! (user1 ~76kB/s
and user3 ~45kB/s).
Of course - as you can see on the graph I created: with more classes
difference beteween u1&u3 is smaller...
Can you send me the script you used for your test which gave you only
5-8%? Maybe there is something wrong with the one of mine?
-josh
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-18 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-17 21:59 [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct me or maybe pljosh
2004-06-18 8:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 11:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some pljosh
2004-06-18 11:28 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 12:50 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 13:30 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 18:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 18:45 ` pljosh [this message]
2004-06-18 21:11 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 21:57 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19 4:05 ` pljosh
2004-06-19 4:14 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 11:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 11:56 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 13:12 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:18 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 15:06 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 16:02 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* confirmed? pljosh
2004-06-24 9:38 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-25 3:58 ` pljosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D33845.6020602@interia.pl \
--to=witek876@interia.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.