From: Ed Wildgoose <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:10:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D5C50D.7090600@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D2D5CB.2000804@wildgooses.com>
> After further investigation I think you need the patch a little more
> like this for PPPoE and the params you gave (Andy do you think this
> looks OK?) Please let me know if this works for you.
Duh, scratch that. I think the original patch will work for PPPoE (give
or take).
Can someone help work out how the heck you calculate the real usage of a
packet over PPPoE? Reading a bit further I get the impression that you
have an 8 byte overhead for PPPoE, then it still travels down an ATM
circuit (just like PPPoA)? Can anyone confirm or deny? I have seen
some reports that you actually have two ethernet frames wrapped inside
each other (which is very inefficient), but I can't see which is right?
If it's the former, then I think the original patch will work well
enough for PPPoE people, it's 2 bytes out, but that shouldn't really
show up.
Can someone please try and report back
Thanks
Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-20 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 11:45 [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 21:43 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 23:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-19 0:33 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19 12:29 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-19 12:54 ` syrius.ml
2004-06-19 13:40 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 7:27 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-20 12:31 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:16 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 16:46 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 17:10 ` Ed Wildgoose [this message]
2004-06-21 6:08 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-21 10:04 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 0:38 ` Damion de Soto
2004-06-22 5:15 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-22 9:54 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 10:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 17:16 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-22 21:52 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-23 12:52 ` ThE LinuX_KiD
2004-06-23 14:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D5C50D.7090600@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.