[LARTC] htb vs hsfc

[LARTC] htb vs hsfc

[Vincent Perrier]

HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
if you want to see comparative test results, go to
http://www.rawsoft.org
at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
a sharing test and a burst test.
You will see that both qdisc are good.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb vs hsfc

[Jason Boxman]

On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote:
> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
> if you want to see comparative test results, go to
> http://www.rawsoft.org
> at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
> a sharing test and a burst test.
> You will see that both qdisc are good.

Excellent information!

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb vs hsfc

[Patrick McHardy]

Vincent Perrier wrote:
> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
> if you want to see comparative test results, go to
> http://www.rawsoft.org
> at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
> a sharing test and a burst test.
> You will see that both qdisc are good.

Nice comparision, very interesting. Note that you have a small
misconfiguration in your HFSC setup. On page 8 you say "The
shaping is impacted by real time bursts". This is only because
your real-time classes are not part of the link-sharing hierarchy.
If you add link-share curves to the real-time classes which are
equal to the real-time curves shaping won't be impacted.

Regards
Patrick
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/