All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC&PATCH 1/2] PCI Error Recovery (readX_check)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:06:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412AF6F5.6020806@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408232231070.17766@ppc970.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'd suggest changing the locking a bit.
> 
> Just make "clear_pci_errors()" take a spinlock on the bridge, and 
> "read_pci_errors()" unlock it. We need to make sure that if multiple 
> devices on the same bridge try to be careful, they can do so without 
> seeing each others errors.

... Why spinlock?
Are rwlocks not smart way to decrease the impact on I/O performance?

> I'd also suggest that you make "clear_pci_errors()" return a cookie for 
> read_pci_errors() to use. 

What I can only imagine is... passing somthing like a identifier of
looking bridge to driver as cookie, functionally, it's sounds good.
... Are there any other useful usages of the cookie?

> Also, I assume that the thing would support (and please make the
> documentation clear on it) multiple IO operations between a
> "clear_pci_errors()" and it's ending "read_pci_errors()" pair.

Sure.
So taking a spinlock between this pair clearly means long time locking on
I/O, this will block all other I/O under same bridge, I think this isn't
good situation.  Still do we take a spinlock?


Thanks,
H.Seto

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC&PATCH 1/2] PCI Error Recovery (readX_check)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:06:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412AF6F5.6020806@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408232231070.17766@ppc970.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'd suggest changing the locking a bit.
> 
> Just make "clear_pci_errors()" take a spinlock on the bridge, and 
> "read_pci_errors()" unlock it. We need to make sure that if multiple 
> devices on the same bridge try to be careful, they can do so without 
> seeing each others errors.

... Why spinlock?
Are rwlocks not smart way to decrease the impact on I/O performance?

> I'd also suggest that you make "clear_pci_errors()" return a cookie for 
> read_pci_errors() to use. 

What I can only imagine is... passing somthing like a identifier of
looking bridge to driver as cookie, functionally, it's sounds good.
... Are there any other useful usages of the cookie?

> Also, I assume that the thing would support (and please make the
> documentation clear on it) multiple IO operations between a
> "clear_pci_errors()" and it's ending "read_pci_errors()" pair.

Sure.
So taking a spinlock between this pair clearly means long time locking on
I/O, this will block all other I/O under same bridge, I think this isn't
good situation.  Still do we take a spinlock?


Thanks,
H.Seto

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-24  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-24  5:24 [RFC&PATCH 1/2] PCI Error Recovery (readX_check) Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-24  5:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-24  5:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-24  5:41   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-24  8:06   ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2004-08-24  8:06     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-25  7:01   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-25  7:01     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-25  7:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25  7:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 15:52       ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-25 15:52         ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-25 17:25         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 17:25           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 23:23       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-25 23:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-25 23:35         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 23:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-25 15:42     ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-25 15:42       ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-28  1:23 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-28  1:23   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-17 12:00   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-17 12:00     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-17 12:06   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-17 12:06     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-18  4:36     ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-18  4:36       ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21  8:32       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-09-21  8:32         ` Hidetoshi Seto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412AF6F5.6020806@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.