All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:00:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41637BD5.7090001@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041005215116.3b0bd028.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:

> This tunable caused an 11% performance difference in (I assume) TPCx. 
> That's a big deal, and people will want to diddle it.
> 

True. But 2.5 I think really is too low (for anyone, except maybe a
CPU with no/a tiny L2 cache).

> If one number works optimally for all machines and workloads then fine.
> 

Yeah.. 10ms may bring up idle times a bit on other workloads. Judith
had some database tests that were very sensitive to this - if 10ms is
OK there, then I'd say it would be OK for most things.

> But yes, avoiding a tunable would be nice, but we need a tunable to work
> out whether we can avoid making it tunable ;)
> 

Heh. I think it would be good to have a automatic thingy to tune it.
A smarter cache_decay_ticks calculation would suit.

> Not that I'm soliciting patches or anything.  I'll duck this one for now.
> 

OK. Any idea when 2.6.9 will be coming out? :)

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-06  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-06  0:42 Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06  0:47 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-06  1:02   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  0:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  4:30   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  4:51     ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:00       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-10-06  5:09         ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:21           ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  5:33             ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:46               ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  6:19               ` new dev model (was Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms) Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06  6:39                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  8:56                   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-06  9:44                   ` bert hubert
2004-10-06 14:00                     ` Andries Brouwer
2004-10-06 19:40                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 19:48                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 19:58                       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 20:37                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-07  1:08                           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07  0:02                       ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-06  9:23                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06  9:57                   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-06 19:33                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 22:23                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-06  5:52       ` Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:27       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:39         ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 20:38           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 20:43             ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 23:14               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-07  2:26                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07  6:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-07  7:08                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07  7:26                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 20:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 21:03               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06  7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 17:18   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 22:46     ` Peter Williams
2004-10-06 13:29 ` [patch] sched: auto-tuning task-migration Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 13:44   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06 17:49   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 20:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 21:18       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-07  6:10         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-21  5:08   ` Paul Jackson
     [not found] <200410071028.01931.habanero@us.ibm.com>
2004-10-07 15:58 ` Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Andrew Theurer
2004-10-08  9:47   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 14:11     ` Andrew Theurer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-07 18:44 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41637BD5.7090001@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=judith@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.