* [LARTC] is this scenario possible ???
@ 2004-11-16 5:01 Drink Linux
2004-11-17 22:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-11-18 12:56 ` Andy Furniss
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Drink Linux @ 2004-11-16 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
hello .
i have no problem shaping incoming traffic from WAN
how do i shape outgoing traffic to WAN depending on
the speed limit of each subnet ....
ex:
10.10.6.0 --> 512kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
10.10.5.0 --> 256kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
do i have to used forward handle,
and used
iptables -s 10.10.6.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 101
and used
iptables -s 10.10.5.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 102
what do i really have to use?
prerouting or postrouting.
do i really need to use imq device on this one ?
i can't seem to get it work .....
thanks for anyone can help...
:D
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] is this scenario possible ???
2004-11-16 5:01 [LARTC] is this scenario possible ??? Drink Linux
@ 2004-11-17 22:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-11-18 12:56 ` Andy Furniss
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2004-11-17 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Drink Linux wrote:
> hello .
>
> i have no problem shaping incoming traffic from WAN
>
> how do i shape outgoing traffic to WAN depending on
> the speed limit of each subnet ....
>
> ex:
> 10.10.6.0 --> 512kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
> 10.10.5.0 --> 256kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
>
>
>
> do i have to used forward handle,
>
> and used
> iptables -s 10.10.6.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 101
>
> and used
> iptables -s 10.10.5.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 102
>
> what do i really have to use?
> prerouting or postrouting.
> do i really need to use imq device on this one ?
>
> i can't seem to get it work .....
>
> thanks for anyone can help...
It depends on your exact setup - what interfaces do you have to where?
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] is this scenario possible ???
2004-11-16 5:01 [LARTC] is this scenario possible ??? Drink Linux
2004-11-17 22:46 ` Andy Furniss
@ 2004-11-18 12:56 ` Andy Furniss
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2004-11-18 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Drink Linux wrote:
>
>> hello .
>>
>> i have no problem shaping incoming traffic from WAN
>>
>> how do i shape outgoing traffic to WAN depending on
>> the speed limit of each subnet ....
>>
>> ex:
>> 10.10.6.0 --> 512kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
>> 10.10.5.0 --> 256kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD)
>>
>>
>>
>> do i have to used forward handle,
>> and used iptables -s 10.10.6.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 101
>>
>> and used iptables -s 10.10.5.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 102
>>
>> what do i really have to use? prerouting or postrouting.
>> do i really need to use imq device on this one ?
>>
>> i can't seem to get it work .....
>>
>> thanks for anyone can help...
>
>
> It depends on your exact setup - what interfaces do you have to where?
>
i have eth0 connected to WAN
and wlan0 connected to LAN ....
i have tried to used postrouting with mark packets but
failed ....
You don't need IMQ as long as you only wan't to shape forwarded traffic.
It should work in postrouting, I think your -d WAN is the problem, you
need to specify interface -o eth0. As you are marking forwarded traffic
you could use forward, and use -i as well as -o eg.
iptables -t mangle -I FORWARD -i wlan0 -o eth0 -s 10.10.5.0/24 -j MARK
--set-mark 102
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-18 12:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-16 5:01 [LARTC] is this scenario possible ??? Drink Linux
2004-11-17 22:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-11-18 12:56 ` Andy Furniss
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.