From: "Marc Müller" <marc.muller@gmx.net>
To: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:32:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FF84EB.3000802@gmx.net> (raw)
Hello List,
Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel
v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments? is
there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29?
Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't
find something useful on google, cvs and the list).
Thanks, Marc
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-01 13:32 Marc Müller [this message]
2005-02-02 8:10 ` [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29 Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FF84EB.3000802@gmx.net \
--to=marc.muller@gmx.net \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.