* [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29
@ 2005-02-01 13:32 Marc Müller
2005-02-02 8:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Müller @ 2005-02-01 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bridge
Hello List,
Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel
v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments? is
there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29?
Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't
find something useful on google, cvs and the list).
Thanks, Marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29
2005-02-01 13:32 [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29 Marc Müller
@ 2005-02-02 8:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2005-02-02 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bridge
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:32:27 +0100
Marc Müller <marc.muller@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel
> v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments?
If it applies clean you should be okay.
is
> there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29?
> Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't
> find something useful on google, cvs and the list).
Check ebtables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-02 8:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-01 13:32 [Bridge] bridge nf vs. 2.4.29 Marc Müller
2005-02-02 8:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.