All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
	albert@users.sourceforge.net,
	Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>,
	David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
	paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	keith maanthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
	Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>, Max Asbock <masbock@us.ibm.com>,
	mahuja@us.ibm.com, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	donf@us.ibm.com, mpm@selenic.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:30:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4288BCA6.9000002@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050515101705.GC26242@wotan.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
>>Will this mean that Linux will have a monotonic time source?
> 
> 2.6 has had one for a long time (posix_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC))

I think that's clock_gettime(), no?

Chris

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
	albert@users.sourceforge.net,
	Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>,
	David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
	paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	keith maanthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
	Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>, Max Asbock <masbock@us.ibm.com>,
	mahuja@us.ibm.com, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	donf@us.ibm.com, mpm@selenic.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:30:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4288BCA6.9000002@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050515101705.GC26242@wotan.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
>>Will this mean that Linux will have a monotonic time source?
> 
> 2.6 has had one for a long time (posix_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC))

I think that's clock_gettime(), no?

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-16 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-14  0:16 [RFC][PATCH (1/7)] new timeofday subsystem (v A5) john stultz
2005-05-14  0:17 ` [RFC][PATCH (2/7)] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes " john stultz
2005-05-14  0:19   ` [RFC][PATCH (3/7)] new timeofday x86-64 " john stultz
2005-05-14  0:20     ` [RFC][PATCH (4/7)] new timeofday i386 and x86-64 timesources " john stultz
2005-05-14  0:22       ` [RFC][PATCH (5/7)] new timeofday ia64,ppc32,ppc64 and s390 arch specific hooks " john stultz
2005-05-14  0:23         ` [RFC][PATCH (6/7)] new timeofday ia64,ppc32,ppc64 and s390 timesources " john stultz
2005-05-14  0:27           ` [RFC][PATCH (7/7)] new timeofday i386 vsyscall proof of concept " john stultz
2005-05-16 21:53             ` john stultz
2005-05-14 19:55         ` IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem Christoph Lameter
2005-05-14 19:55           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-15  9:12           ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-05-15 10:22             ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-05-15 10:17             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-15 10:17               ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-16 15:30               ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2005-05-16 15:30                 ` Chris Friesen
2005-05-16 17:34           ` john stultz
2005-05-16 17:34             ` john stultz
2005-05-16 18:09             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 18:09               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 18:45               ` john stultz
2005-05-16 18:45                 ` john stultz
2005-05-16 18:55                 ` john stultz
2005-05-16 18:55                   ` john stultz
2005-05-16 19:24                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 19:24                   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 19:29                   ` David Mosberger
2005-05-16 19:29                     ` David Mosberger
2005-05-16 19:50                     ` john stultz
2005-05-16 19:50                       ` john stultz
2005-05-16 20:27                       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 20:27                         ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 20:53                         ` john stultz
2005-05-16 20:53                           ` john stultz
2005-05-16 20:58                           ` David Mosberger
2005-05-16 20:58                             ` David Mosberger
2005-05-16 21:35                             ` john stultz
2005-05-16 21:35                               ` john stultz
2005-05-16 21:53                               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-16 21:53                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-05-17  8:05                     ` Ulrich Windl
2005-05-17  8:05                       ` Ulrich Windl
2005-05-16 18:52     ` [RFC][PATCH (3/7)] new timeofday x86-64 specific changes (v A5) john stultz
2005-05-17 23:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new timeofday-based soft-timer subsystem Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-17 23:34   ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] move arch-specific timeofday core to asm Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-17 23:36   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] convert soft-timer subsystem to timerintervals Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-18  8:21     ` [RFC][UPDATE PATCH " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-18 15:59       ` Jonathan Corbet
2005-05-18 17:00         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-17 23:37   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] convert sys_nanosleep() to use new soft-timer subsystem Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-17 23:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] support new soft-timer subsystem on non-NEWTOD archs Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-19 23:29   ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new timeofday-based soft-timer subsystem Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4288BCA6.9000002@nortel.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=James@superbug.co.uk \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=donf@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --cc=mahuja@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=masbock@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    --cc=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.