All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Oglesby <doglesby@teleformix.com>
To: Matthias Barremaecker <info@mh.be>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem ...
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:51:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429C6BE8.4090906@teleformix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <429AAFDC.4050208@mh.be>

Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanx for your reply.
> 
> The data is not THAT importend, all our importend data is backuped 4 
> times, inc. original (well, 3 times now, since the 1300gig machine is 
> broke).
> 
> I did a bit furtur reasearch and maybe this is something to think about 
> if you use reiserfs :
> 
> I did a bad block check and I have 10 bad blocks of 4096bytes on 1300Gig 
> and ... that is the reason reiserfs will not work anymore.
> 
> I guess this sux. I rather have that the data on the bad blocks is just 
> corupted but the rest is accesseble.
> 
> I'm doing a --rebuild-tree with the bad block list. Hopes this works.
> 
> 
> Aren't there any tools to substract data from a broken reiserfs partition ?
> 
> 
> kind regardes,
> 
> Matthias.
> 
> 
> 


I'm currently in a similar situation:  1TB (RAID-5) ReiserFS filesystem 
running on RedHat 7.2 with a Promise SX6000 controller.  Everything was 
running stock version/firmware/BIOS, and it suddently developed 39 bad 
blocks after a power outage.

reiserfsck --rebuild-tree (version 3.6.4, the latest for RH 7.2) failed 
to complete after the controller kept hard locking/crashing.

So, I've compiled a plain 2.4.30 kernel (from kernel.org, not RedHat), 
updated the BIOS/Firmware on the SX6000, and compiled and installed the 
latest reiserfsprogs (3.6.19, I believe?), and have been running 
badblocks (non-destructive) for the last four days.  Nothing has turned 
up so far.

I'm hoping the next time I run a --rebuild-tree, it will be able to 
complete.  I really do need to get the data off of this filesystem.

Good luck with your recovery.

--Dan




> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:25:54 +0200, Matthias Barremaecker said:
>>
>>
>>> but that sais it is a fysical drive error
>>
>>
>>
>> Physical drive errors.  Your hardware is broken.  Isn't much that 
>> Reiserfs
>> can do about it.
>>
>>
>>> What can I do.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) Call whoever you get hardware support from.
>>
>> 2) Be ready to restore from backups.
>>
>> 3) If you didn't have RAID-5 (or similar) set up, or a good backup, 
>> consider
>> it a learning experience.
>>
>> If your data is important enough that you'll care if you lose it, you 
>> should take
>> steps to make sure you won't lose it... It's that simple.
>>
>> (Just for the record, if we have important info, it gets at least 
>> RAID5, a
>> backup to tape or other device, *and* a *second* backup off-site.  And 
>> my shop
>> is far from the most paranoid about such things.)
>>
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-31 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1117392967.29669.ezmlm@namesys.com>
2005-05-29 19:25 ` Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-29 21:37   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-30  6:17     ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-30  7:37       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-24 11:38         ` Minor note FYI Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-05-31 13:51       ` Dan Oglesby [this message]
2005-05-31 14:14         ` Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-31 15:09           ` Dan Oglesby
2005-05-31 17:31             ` Christian
2005-06-01  6:47             ` Reiserfsck 1300Gig failed with following error Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 10:06               ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 10:57                 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 11:12                   ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 12:28                     ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 12:52                       ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 13:32                         ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 14:37             ` 13000Gig partition badblock check is the same -- do a reiserfsck again ? Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 14:28               ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-02 15:16                 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 15:04                   ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-02 15:28                     ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 21:03                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-02 21:32                   ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-03  7:10                     ` 13000Gig partition badblock check is the same -- do a reiserfsck again ? -> ran badblocks Matthias Barremaecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429C6BE8.4090906@teleformix.com \
    --to=doglesby@teleformix.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=info@mh.be \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.