From: Matthias Barremaecker <info@mh.be>
To: Dan Oglesby <doglesby@teleformix.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: 13000Gig partition badblock check is the same -- do a reiserfsck again ?
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:28:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <429F25AF.90405@mh.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <429F201B.6050707@teleformix.com>
Hi Dan,
I'm using Gentoo kernel
Linux hyperspace 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #6 SMP Tue Apr 19 23:40:58 CEST 2005
i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Kind regardes,
Matthias.
Dan Oglesby wrote:
> What kind of kernel are you running? I had to dump my RedHat kernel and
> use the latest kernel from http://www.kernel.org (2.4.30) for my system.
>
> The problem I was having was due to the kernel being a bit old, and the
> hardware not handling bad blocks properly on an array. Updating the
> software, drivers, firmware and BIOS on everything in my system allowed
> reiserfsck to work properly, and fix my filesystem.
>
> --Dan
>
> Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I'm glad you have your data back and just lost 2 files. It gives me a
>> bit of ... hope :))
>>
>> The error I've got was :
>> --------------------------------------------
>> 2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
>> 731305 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
>> "r5" hash is selected
>> Flushing..finished
>> Read blocks (but not data blocks) 313507947
>> Leaves among those 439626
>> - corrected leaves 46
>> - leaves all contents of which could not be
>> saved and deleted 56
>> pointers in indirect items to wrong area 3997 (zeroed)
>> Objectids found 731997
>>
>> Pass 1 (will try to insert 439570 leaves):
>> ####### Pass 1 #######
>> Looking for allocable blocks .. finished
>> 0%....20%....40%pass1.c 212 balance_condition_2_fails
>> balance_condition_2_fails: block 1288402, pointer 168: The left
>> delimiting key [1412453424 1412453424 0x10001000 ??? (15)] of the block
>> (170046457) is wrong,the item cannot be found
>> --------------------------------------------
>>
>> What just doens't make any sens to me.
>>
>> I'm using version 3.6.19.
>>
>> If you have any ideas ...
>>
>> Thanx.
>>
>> kind regardes,
>>
>>
>> Matthias.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dan Oglesby wrote:
>> > Matthias Barremaecker wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The first time, I did a bad block check, and feeded that list to the
>> >> reiserfsck --rebuild-tree.
>> >>
>> >> The reiserfsck FAILED in phase 2.
>> >>
>> >> Now I have done a bad block check again and the list is the same, so
>> >> no new bad blocks have occoured.
>> >>
>> >> Is it sane to do the reiserfsck --rebuild-tree again, or will it fail
>> >> again?
>> >>
>> >> thanx.
>> >>
>> >> kind regardes,
>> >>
>> >> Matthias.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > What error did you get? Same as before?
>> >
>> > FWIW, I was able to successfully recover my corrupted array! Had to
>> > update all hardware to latest BIOS/Firmware, all software and
>> drivers to
>> > latest versions. Took two days to run, but it completed, and I
>> ended up
>> > only losing 2 files out of over 1.1 million files on a 1TB RAID-5
>> > array. That's not too bad, considering how many times the machine
>> went
>> > up and down due to bad power in the building.
>> >
>> > --Dan
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
--
Matthias Barremaecker, MH.BE - Arta nv
0495 30 31 72
http://mh.be/
SERVER HOUSING per 1HE € 50 per maand
20Gig traffic, 100Mbit netwerk
Center te Antwerpen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1117392967.29669.ezmlm@namesys.com>
2005-05-29 19:25 ` Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-29 21:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-30 6:17 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-30 7:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-24 11:38 ` Minor note FYI Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-05-31 13:51 ` Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem Dan Oglesby
2005-05-31 14:14 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-05-31 15:09 ` Dan Oglesby
2005-05-31 17:31 ` Christian
2005-06-01 6:47 ` Reiserfsck 1300Gig failed with following error Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 10:06 ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 10:57 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 11:12 ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 12:28 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-01 12:52 ` Vitaly Fertman
2005-06-01 13:32 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 14:37 ` 13000Gig partition badblock check is the same -- do a reiserfsck again ? Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 14:28 ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-02 15:16 ` Matthias Barremaecker
2005-06-02 15:04 ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-02 15:28 ` Matthias Barremaecker [this message]
2005-06-02 21:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-02 21:32 ` Dan Oglesby
2005-06-03 7:10 ` 13000Gig partition badblock check is the same -- do a reiserfsck again ? -> ran badblocks Matthias Barremaecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=429F25AF.90405@mh.be \
--to=info@mh.be \
--cc=doglesby@teleformix.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.