All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
Cc: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@telenet.be>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rankincj@yahoo.com,
	ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netfilter-devel@manty.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:16:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42B82F35.3040909@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119338382.3390.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]

Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> Deferring the hooks makes the bridge-nf code alot more complicated, so I
> would be glad to get rid of it if it is the right thing to do. But
> backwards compatibility can't be maintained and I'd be surprised if
> every ruleset that now works will still be possible using an
> iptables/ebtables scheme.

I unfortunately don't see a way to remove it, but we should keep
thinking about it. Can you please check if the attached patch is
correct? It should exclude all packets handled by bridge-netfilter
from having their conntrack reference dropped. I didn't add nf_reset()'s
to the bridging code because with tc actions the packets can end up
anywhere else anyway, and this will hopefully get fixed right sometime.

BTW. this line from ip_sabotage_out() looks wrong, it will clear all
flags instead of setting the BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT flag (second
patch):

                        nf_bridge->mask &= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>

[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 448 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -188,7 +188,12 @@ static inline int ip_finish_output2(stru
 		skb = skb2;
 	}
 
-	nf_reset(skb);
+#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
+	/* bridge-netfilter defers calling some IP hooks to the bridge layer and
+	 * still needs the conntrack reference */
+	if (skb->nf_bridge == NULL)
+#endif
+		nf_reset(skb);
 
 	if (hh) {
 		int hh_alen;

[-- Attachment #3: 10.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 573 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static unsigned int ip_sabotage_out(unsi
 		 * doesn't use the bridge parent of the indev by using
 		 * the BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT mask. */
 		if (hook == NF_IP_FORWARD && nf_bridge->physindev == NULL) {
-			nf_bridge->mask &= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;
+			nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;
 			nf_bridge->physindev = (struct net_device *)in;
 		}
 #if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
Cc: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@telenet.be>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netfilter-devel@manty.net, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, rankincj@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:16:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42B82F35.3040909@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119338382.3390.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]

Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> Deferring the hooks makes the bridge-nf code alot more complicated, so I
> would be glad to get rid of it if it is the right thing to do. But
> backwards compatibility can't be maintained and I'd be surprised if
> every ruleset that now works will still be possible using an
> iptables/ebtables scheme.

I unfortunately don't see a way to remove it, but we should keep
thinking about it. Can you please check if the attached patch is
correct? It should exclude all packets handled by bridge-netfilter
from having their conntrack reference dropped. I didn't add nf_reset()'s
to the bridging code because with tc actions the packets can end up
anywhere else anyway, and this will hopefully get fixed right sometime.

BTW. this line from ip_sabotage_out() looks wrong, it will clear all
flags instead of setting the BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT flag (second
patch):

                        nf_bridge->mask &= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>

[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 448 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -188,7 +188,12 @@ static inline int ip_finish_output2(stru
 		skb = skb2;
 	}
 
-	nf_reset(skb);
+#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
+	/* bridge-netfilter defers calling some IP hooks to the bridge layer and
+	 * still needs the conntrack reference */
+	if (skb->nf_bridge == NULL)
+#endif
+		nf_reset(skb);
 
 	if (hh) {
 		int hh_alen;

[-- Attachment #3: 10.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 573 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static unsigned int ip_sabotage_out(unsi
 		 * doesn't use the bridge parent of the indev by using
 		 * the BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT mask. */
 		if (hook == NF_IP_FORWARD && nf_bridge->physindev == NULL) {
-			nf_bridge->mask &= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;
+			nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_DONT_TAKE_PARENT;
 			nf_bridge->physindev = (struct net_device *)in;
 		}
 #if defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) || defined(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_MODULE)

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-21 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-18 12:43 2.6.12: connection tracking broken? Chris Rankin
2005-06-18 14:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-18 15:14   ` Tobias DiPasquale
2005-06-18 17:16     ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-20  7:19   ` Harald Welte
2005-06-20  7:19     ` Harald Welte
2005-06-18 19:25 ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-18 22:12   ` Santiago Garcia Mantinan
2005-06-19 13:05     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-19 13:05       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20  0:05       ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20  0:05         ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20  0:18         ` David S. Miller
2005-06-20  0:18           ` David S. Miller
2005-06-20  0:50           ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20  0:50             ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-20  2:45         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20  2:45           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20  6:39           ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 12:15             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 12:15               ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 18:46               ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 18:46                 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-20 18:57                 ` Phil Oester
2005-06-20 18:57                   ` Phil Oester
2005-06-20 23:27                   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 23:27                     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 23:22                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-20 23:22                   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21  7:19                   ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21  7:19                     ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 15:16                     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-06-21 15:16                       ` Patrick McHardy
     [not found]                       ` <42B82F35.3040909-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2005-06-21 20:46                         ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 20:46                           ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-21 21:23                           ` Chris Wright
2005-06-21 22:32                             ` David S. Miller
2005-06-21 22:34                               ` Chris Wright
2005-06-22  0:26                               ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 22:58                                 ` Chris Rankin
2005-06-23 17:42                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23 19:49                                     ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24  8:39                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-28 23:07                                         ` David S. Miller
2005-06-22  0:45                           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22  0:45                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 21:49                       ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-22 21:49                         ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23  0:02                         ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-06-23  0:02                           ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-06-23  3:31                           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23  3:31                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23  6:27                           ` [Ebtables-devel] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-23  6:27                             ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-23  3:26                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23  3:26                           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-23  3:53                           ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23  3:53                             ` Herbert Xu
2005-06-23  6:23                         ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-23  6:23                           ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-06-27  8:32                           ` Harald Welte
2005-06-27  8:32                             ` Harald Welte
2005-06-27 11:46                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 11:46                               ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42B82F35.3040909@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
    --cc=bdschuym@telenet.be \
    --cc=ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@manty.net \
    --cc=rankincj@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.