* Question about patch order
@ 2005-07-01 19:51 George Anzinger
2005-07-01 20:09 ` Michał Piotrowski
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Anzinger @ 2005-07-01 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkml
Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but...
What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be
2.6.x or 2.6.x.n
e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel?
If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff?
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Question about patch order
2005-07-01 19:51 Question about patch order George Anzinger
@ 2005-07-01 20:09 ` Michał Piotrowski
2005-07-01 20:12 ` Robert Love
2005-07-01 22:06 ` Daniel Walker
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Piotrowski @ 2005-07-01 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: george, linux-kernel
Hi,
George Anzinger wrote:
> Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but...
>
> What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be
> 2.6.x or 2.6.x.n
> e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel?
Patch is against 2.6.x.
>
> If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff?
>
>
Yes. If -rc is newer than .n.
Regards,
Michał Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about patch order
2005-07-01 19:51 Question about patch order George Anzinger
2005-07-01 20:09 ` Michał Piotrowski
@ 2005-07-01 20:12 ` Robert Love
2005-07-01 22:06 ` Daniel Walker
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Love @ 2005-07-01 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: george; +Cc: lkml
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:51 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
> Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but...
>
> What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be
> 2.6.x or 2.6.x.n
> e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel?
2.6.x.
E.g., apply 2.6.13-rc1 on top of 2.6.12.
> If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff?
Supposed to, but the trees aren't formally parent/children.
Robert Love
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about patch order
2005-07-01 19:51 Question about patch order George Anzinger
2005-07-01 20:09 ` Michał Piotrowski
2005-07-01 20:12 ` Robert Love
@ 2005-07-01 22:06 ` Daniel Walker
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2005-07-01 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: george; +Cc: lkml
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:51 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
> Suppose I am doing this prior to my morning coffee, but...
>
> What should the -rc patch(s) be applied to? Should it be
> 2.6.x or 2.6.x.n
> e.g. the 2.6.12 kernel or the 2.6.12.2 kernel?
>
> If the former, does the -rc contain the .n stuff?
2.6.x
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-01 22:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-01 19:51 Question about patch order George Anzinger
2005-07-01 20:09 ` Michał Piotrowski
2005-07-01 20:12 ` Robert Love
2005-07-01 22:06 ` Daniel Walker
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.