All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is anyone else getting these.
@ 2005-07-02  1:53 Gary W. Smith
  2005-07-02  5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gary W. Smith @ 2005-07-02  1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]

I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org.  I'm wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?



FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found 
on relays.ordb.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org

Your message

  To:      netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
  Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
relays.ordb.org
  Sent:    Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200

did not reach the following recipient(s):

phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
    Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.
	Die MTS-ID der ursprünglichen Nachricht ist: c=de;a= ;p=echtzeit
gmbh ? ;l=EZMXS0507012111NLNP7YNT
    MSEXCH:IMS:Echtzeit GmbH & Co. KG:ECHTZEIT:EZMXS 0 (000C05A6)
Unbekannter Empfänger



[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1788 bytes --]

From: "Gary W. Smith" <gary@primeexalia.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:56:12 -0700
Message-ID: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE58290741D@pxtbenexd01.pxt.primeexalia.com>

Hello, 

I have a new challenge of trying to map some IP's to a single IP but
with a static port.  Here is a sample.

Given 1 externally public IP I need to publish the entire internal class
C subnet worth of machines using their internal static IP address but
mapping them to different ports.

Each workstation has a TCP processing running on a fixed port.  For all
intents and purposes let's say it's SMTP.  What I need to do, using the
single static IP address is map out a single port for each server behind
it.

So, given 10.99.0.x it we want something like this

10.99.0.1:25 = 199.199.80.41:30001
10.99.0.2:25 = 199.199.80.41:30002
...
10.99.0.250:25 = 199.199.80.41:30250

Is there a simple way to do this?  Currently we have a pre/post routing
line per entry.  Is there a better way?

Thanks, 

Gary Smith

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-02  1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
@ 2005-07-02  5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
  2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
  2005-07-04  9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2005-07-02  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org <> scribbled on :

> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org.  I'm
> wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?

Last time I checked I'm not, also netfilter.org wasn't.

A few days ago there was a post about this ; even their postmaster@...
seems to refuse email.
Maybe phergenhahn@echtzeit.de can be removed from the list ??


Gr,
Rob


> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending
> mail server found on relays.ordb.org
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request -
> Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
> 
> Your message
> 
>   To:      netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
>   Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail
> server found on relays.ordb.org
>   Sent:    Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
> 
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
> 
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
>     Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.
> 	Die MTS-ID der ursprünglichen Nachricht ist: c=de;a=
> ;p=echtzeit gmbh ? ;l=EZMXS0507012111NLNP7YNT
>     MSEXCH:IMS:Echtzeit GmbH & Co. KG:ECHTZEIT:EZMXS 0
> (000C05A6) Unbekannter Empfänger




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-02  1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
  2005-07-02  5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
@ 2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
  2005-07-02 20:03   ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
  2005-07-03 14:08   ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
  2005-07-04  9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: /dev/rob0 @ 2005-07-02  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Gary W. Smith wrote:
> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org.  I'm wondering if
 > they blacklisted netfilter.org?

Vishnu.netfilter.org is not listed in any public block lists TTBOMK.

> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found 
> on relays.ordb.org
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
> 
> Your message
> 
>   To:      netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
>   Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
> relays.ordb.org
>   Sent:    Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
> 
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
> 
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200

I got one and looked at the headers. I thought perhaps their braindead 
Microsoft software was reading the Received: lines and finding 
something. If so I don't know what it is.

More likely, it simply has a faulty test for relays.ordb.org. In Unix 
terms, something like /bin/true is checking. It always returns a 
positive result.

$ host 62.96.59.178
178.59.96.62.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 
h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net.
$ host h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net.
Host h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

They don't even have proper rDNS set up. Not surprising. This one would 
be a good candidate for spam blacklisting, and in due time it will be 
listed in the more aggressive RBL's.
-- 
     mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
     or "not-spam" is in Subject: header


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* /dev/rob0
  2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
@ 2005-07-02 20:03   ` tahmeed
  2005-07-03 14:08   ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tahmeed @ 2005-07-02 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: /dev/rob0; +Cc: netfilter

hi!

it seems that u r talking about the SPAM warning or in other words
returned mail from a specific address. if so i would like to mention
that every time i posts to netfilter one such message is arriving  
within few mins.

i wonder what they have done in their conf........


-- 
Happy! If not now never


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
  2005-07-02 20:03   ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
@ 2005-07-03 14:08   ` Jan Engelhardt
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-07-03 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: /dev/rob0; +Cc: netfilter


>> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org.  I'm wondering if
>> they blacklisted netfilter.org?

No. I even get that SPAM report if I write personally to that address, or 
anything-you-have-not-imagined-yet.

>> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
>
> I got one and looked at the headers. I thought perhaps their braindead
> Microsoft software was reading the Received: lines and finding something. If so
> I don't know what it is.

IIRC I read 'unknown user' account somewhere. Anyway, action should be taken.



Jan Engelhardt                                                               
--                                                                            
| Gesellschaft fuer Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Goettingen,
| Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, www.gwdg.de


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-02  1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
  2005-07-02  5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
  2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
@ 2005-07-04  9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
  2005-07-04 18:30   ` Taylor, Grant
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Harmuth @ 2005-07-04  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Gary W. Smith schrieb:
> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org.  I'm wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?
> 
> 
> 
> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found 
> on relays.ordb.org
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
> 
> Your message
> 
>   To:      netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
>   Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
> relays.ordb.org
>   Sent:    Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
> 
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
> 
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
>     Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.

I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding

:0
* From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
/dev/null

to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)

Have a nice time,

Joerg




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-04  9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
@ 2005-07-04 18:30   ` Taylor, Grant
  2005-07-05  8:59     ` Jörg Harmuth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Taylor, Grant @ 2005-07-04 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us) from seeing such emails.  But being the email administrator (postmaster) that I am I feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that.  Why don't we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem email address from the mail list.



Grant. . . .


> I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
> get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding
> 
> :0
> * From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
> /dev/null
> 
> to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)
> 
> Have a nice time,
> 
> Joerg



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-04 18:30   ` Taylor, Grant
@ 2005-07-05  8:59     ` Jörg Harmuth
  2005-07-05 10:53       ` Rob Sterenborg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Harmuth @ 2005-07-05  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Taylor, Grant schrieb:
> Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us) from seeing
> such emails.  But being the email administrator (postmaster) that I am I
> feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that.  Why don't
> we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem email
> address from the mail list.

I agree, but unfortunately I'm not in the position to do this and thus
just have to "live" with it...

Have a nice time,

Joerg

> 
> Grant. . . .
> 
> 
>> I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
>> get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding
>>
>> :0
>> * From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
>> /dev/null
>>
>> to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)
>>
>> Have a nice time,
>>
>> Joerg
> 
> 





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-05  8:59     ` Jörg Harmuth
@ 2005-07-05 10:53       ` Rob Sterenborg
  2005-07-05 11:21         ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2005-07-05 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

> > Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us) 
> from seeing 
> > such emails.  But being the email administrator 
> (postmaster) that I am 
> > I feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that.  Why 
> > don't we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem 
> > email address from the mail list.
> 
> I agree, but unfortunately I'm not in the position to do this 
> and thus just have to "live" with it...

Is there no listmaster we can reach ?
Maybe postmaster@netfilter.org or netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org
?


Gr,
Rob



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
  2005-07-05 10:53       ` Rob Sterenborg
@ 2005-07-05 11:21         ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-07-05 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Sterenborg; +Cc: netfilter


>Is there no listmaster we can reach ?
>Maybe postmaster@netfilter.org or netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org

I did not get any responses from netfilter-owner@lists.netfilter.org yet; and 
I was told that Harald Welte is responsible for list management..




Jan Engelhardt                                                               
--                                                                            
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-05 11:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-02  1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
2005-07-02  5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-02  9:16 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-02 20:03   ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
2005-07-03 14:08   ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-04  9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-04 18:30   ` Taylor, Grant
2005-07-05  8:59     ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-05 10:53       ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-05 11:21         ` Jan Engelhardt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.