* Is anyone else getting these.
@ 2005-07-02 1:53 Gary W. Smith
2005-07-02 5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gary W. Smith @ 2005-07-02 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]
I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org. I'm wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?
FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found
on relays.ordb.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
Your message
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
relays.ordb.org
Sent: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
did not reach the following recipient(s):
phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.
Die MTS-ID der ursprünglichen Nachricht ist: c=de;a= ;p=echtzeit
gmbh ? ;l=EZMXS0507012111NLNP7YNT
MSEXCH:IMS:Echtzeit GmbH & Co. KG:ECHTZEIT:EZMXS 0 (000C05A6)
Unbekannter Empfänger
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1788 bytes --]
From: "Gary W. Smith" <gary@primeexalia.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:56:12 -0700
Message-ID: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE58290741D@pxtbenexd01.pxt.primeexalia.com>
Hello,
I have a new challenge of trying to map some IP's to a single IP but
with a static port. Here is a sample.
Given 1 externally public IP I need to publish the entire internal class
C subnet worth of machines using their internal static IP address but
mapping them to different ports.
Each workstation has a TCP processing running on a fixed port. For all
intents and purposes let's say it's SMTP. What I need to do, using the
single static IP address is map out a single port for each server behind
it.
So, given 10.99.0.x it we want something like this
10.99.0.1:25 = 199.199.80.41:30001
10.99.0.2:25 = 199.199.80.41:30002
...
10.99.0.250:25 = 199.199.80.41:30250
Is there a simple way to do this? Currently we have a pre/post routing
line per entry. Is there a better way?
Thanks,
Gary Smith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-02 1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
@ 2005-07-02 5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-04 9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2005-07-02 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org <> scribbled on :
> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org. I'm
> wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?
Last time I checked I'm not, also netfilter.org wasn't.
A few days ago there was a post about this ; even their postmaster@...
seems to refuse email.
Maybe phergenhahn@echtzeit.de can be removed from the list ??
Gr,
Rob
> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending
> mail server found on relays.ordb.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request -
> Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
>
> Your message
>
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail
> server found on relays.ordb.org
> Sent: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
>
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
> Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.
> Die MTS-ID der ursprünglichen Nachricht ist: c=de;a=
> ;p=echtzeit gmbh ? ;l=EZMXS0507012111NLNP7YNT
> MSEXCH:IMS:Echtzeit GmbH & Co. KG:ECHTZEIT:EZMXS 0
> (000C05A6) Unbekannter Empfänger
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-02 1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
2005-07-02 5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
@ 2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-02 20:03 ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
2005-07-03 14:08 ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-04 9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: /dev/rob0 @ 2005-07-02 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Gary W. Smith wrote:
> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org. I'm wondering if
> they blacklisted netfilter.org?
Vishnu.netfilter.org is not listed in any public block lists TTBOMK.
> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found
> on relays.ordb.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
>
> Your message
>
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
> relays.ordb.org
> Sent: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
>
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
I got one and looked at the headers. I thought perhaps their braindead
Microsoft software was reading the Received: lines and finding
something. If so I don't know what it is.
More likely, it simply has a faulty test for relays.ordb.org. In Unix
terms, something like /bin/true is checking. It always returns a
positive result.
$ host 62.96.59.178
178.59.96.62.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net.
$ host h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net.
Host h-62.96.59.178.host.de.colt.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
They don't even have proper rDNS set up. Not surprising. This one would
be a good candidate for spam blacklisting, and in due time it will be
listed in the more aggressive RBL's.
--
mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* /dev/rob0
2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
@ 2005-07-02 20:03 ` tahmeed
2005-07-03 14:08 ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tahmeed @ 2005-07-02 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: /dev/rob0; +Cc: netfilter
hi!
it seems that u r talking about the SPAM warning or in other words
returned mail from a specific address. if so i would like to mention
that every time i posts to netfilter one such message is arriving
within few mins.
i wonder what they have done in their conf........
--
Happy! If not now never
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-02 20:03 ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
@ 2005-07-03 14:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-07-03 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: /dev/rob0; +Cc: netfilter
>> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org. I'm wondering if
>> they blacklisted netfilter.org?
No. I even get that SPAM report if I write personally to that address, or
anything-you-have-not-imagined-yet.
>> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
>
> I got one and looked at the headers. I thought perhaps their braindead
> Microsoft software was reading the Received: lines and finding something. If so
> I don't know what it is.
IIRC I read 'unknown user' account somewhere. Anyway, action should be taken.
Jan Engelhardt
--
| Gesellschaft fuer Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Goettingen,
| Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, www.gwdg.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-02 1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
2005-07-02 5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
@ 2005-07-04 9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-04 18:30 ` Taylor, Grant
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Harmuth @ 2005-07-04 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Gary W. Smith schrieb:
> I have verified my IP's not to on relays.ordb.org. I'm wondering if they blacklisted netfilter.org?
>
>
>
> FW: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found
> on relays.ordb.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator [mailto:postmaster@echtzeit.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Gary W. Smith
> Subject: Unzustellbar: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on relays.ordb.org
>
> Your message
>
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: [SPAM] - Crazy portmap request - Sending mail server found on
> relays.ordb.org
> Sent: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:12 +0200
>
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
> phergenhahn@echtzeit.de on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:11:28 +0200
> Der Name des Empfängers wurde nicht erkannt.
I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding
:0
* From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
/dev/null
to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)
Have a nice time,
Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-04 9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
@ 2005-07-04 18:30 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-07-05 8:59 ` Jörg Harmuth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Taylor, Grant @ 2005-07-04 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us) from seeing such emails. But being the email administrator (postmaster) that I am I feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that. Why don't we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem email address from the mail list.
Grant. . . .
> I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
> get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding
>
> :0
> * From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
> /dev/null
>
> to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)
>
> Have a nice time,
>
> Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-04 18:30 ` Taylor, Grant
@ 2005-07-05 8:59 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-05 10:53 ` Rob Sterenborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Harmuth @ 2005-07-05 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Taylor, Grant schrieb:
> Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us) from seeing
> such emails. But being the email administrator (postmaster) that I am I
> feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that. Why don't
> we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem email
> address from the mail list.
I agree, but unfortunately I'm not in the position to do this and thus
just have to "live" with it...
Have a nice time,
Joerg
>
> Grant. . . .
>
>
>> I suppose that everyone posting to the list gets this mail - at least I
>> get it ervery time. Like Jason already posted, adding
>>
>> :0
>> * From.*postmaster@echtzeit.com
>> /dev/null
>>
>> to my .procmailrc solved this and mekes me feel better :)
>>
>> Have a nice time,
>>
>> Joerg
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-05 8:59 ` Jörg Harmuth
@ 2005-07-05 10:53 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-05 11:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Sterenborg @ 2005-07-05 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
> > Yes, such a client side filter will prevent end users (us)
> from seeing
> > such emails. But being the email administrator
> (postmaster) that I am
> > I feel that such a solution is a patch and a poor one at that. Why
> > don't we resolve the real problem, that being to remove the problem
> > email address from the mail list.
>
> I agree, but unfortunately I'm not in the position to do this
> and thus just have to "live" with it...
Is there no listmaster we can reach ?
Maybe postmaster@netfilter.org or netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org
?
Gr,
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: Is anyone else getting these.
2005-07-05 10:53 ` Rob Sterenborg
@ 2005-07-05 11:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-07-05 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Sterenborg; +Cc: netfilter
>Is there no listmaster we can reach ?
>Maybe postmaster@netfilter.org or netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org
I did not get any responses from netfilter-owner@lists.netfilter.org yet; and
I was told that Harald Welte is responsible for list management..
Jan Engelhardt
--
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-05 11:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-02 1:53 Is anyone else getting these Gary W. Smith
2005-07-02 5:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-02 9:16 ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-02 20:03 ` /dev/rob0 tahmeed
2005-07-03 14:08 ` Is anyone else getting these Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-04 9:09 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-04 18:30 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-07-05 8:59 ` Jörg Harmuth
2005-07-05 10:53 ` Rob Sterenborg
2005-07-05 11:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.