From: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: [PATCH] Drop expectation refcount after unlinking expectation
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 02:38:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F2B507.8070207@eurodev.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
This patch comes from the following thread:
[PATCH 6/7] Fix expectation creation
In unlink_expect, the expectation is removed from the list so the
refcount must be dropped as well.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@eurodev.net>
This fixes the problem although I think that there's something wrong
with current refcounting. Every time an expectation is created, the
refcount of the master conntrack is incremented. Then, if the master
conntrack is destroyed, say the timeout has expired,
ip_ct_remove_expectation will be called. So firstly, all expectations
linked to such conntrack are destroyed and then the conntrack itself.
OK, my question is: why do we need to increase the master conntrack
refcount for expectations, if they are always killed first? Actually I
think that the master conntrack refcount should be increased once the
expectation is confirmed but not in ip_conntrack_expect_alloc.
[-- Attachment #2: 04fix-leak.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 543 bytes --]
Index: netfilter-2.6.14/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
===================================================================
--- netfilter-2.6.14.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c 2005-08-03 16:32:30.000000000 +0200
+++ netfilter-2.6.14/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c 2005-08-03 16:39:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@
list_del(&exp->list);
CONNTRACK_STAT_INC(expect_delete);
exp->master->expecting--;
+ ip_conntrack_expect_put(exp);
}
void __ip_ct_expect_unlink_destroy(struct ip_conntrack_expect *exp)
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-05 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-05 0:38 Pablo Neira [this message]
2005-08-05 10:21 ` [PATCH] Drop expectation refcount after unlinking expectation Patrick McHardy
2005-08-05 13:17 ` Harald Welte
2005-08-06 14:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-05 10:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-05 13:08 ` Harald Welte
2005-08-06 14:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-08 0:59 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-08-05 13:20 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F2B507.8070207@eurodev.net \
--to=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.