Stabilisation of 1.3.2?

Stabilisation of 1.3.2?

[Mgr. Peter Tuharsky]

    Hallo,

    I'd like to ask anybody competent, if 1.3.2 couldn't be stabilised. 
It has been here for a while, poeople need it's features, and I simply 
feel it's time to "move on" ;o)

       Sincerely Peter

Re: Stabilisation of 1.3.2?

[Stas Sergeev]

Hello.

Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> I'd like to ask anybody competent, if 1.3.2 couldn't be stabilised.
Of course it can be. 1.3.2 had some nasty things
inside, but now most of its PRs were resolved, so
I'd say it had quite stabilized.

> It has been here for a while, poeople need it's features, and I simply
> feel it's time to "move on" ;o)
What do you mean by "move on"? If you have the
particular list of the new features you'd like to
see added - feel free to make that list available.
If you just want to move on by following the project
development - cvs is your friend, and you can follow
the code progress very closely. The project *is*
moving on, and it had advanced since 1.3.2 too. It
just depends on the one's particular needs whether
or not it moves on for him. It is even possible for
everyone to influence the direction, so if you feel
like it's time to move on - then go ahead! :)