All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:48:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4382F765.4020707@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511221026200.31192@skynet>

Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> 
>>>All of that said, I am not even sure we have a bit left in the page
>>>flags on smaller architectures :/.
>>
>>How about
>>
>>#define PG_checked               8      /* kill me in 2.5.<early>. */
>>
>>?
>>
>>At least PG_uncached isn't used on many architectures too, so could
>>be reused. I don't know why those that use it don't check VMAs instead.
>>
> 
> 
> PG_unchecked appears to be totally unused. It's only users are the macros
> that manipulate the bit and mm/page_alloc.c . It appears it has been a
> long time since it was used to it is a canditate for reuse.
> 
Considering memory hotplug, I don't want to resize bitmaps at hot-add/remove.
no bitmap is welcome :)

-- Kame


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:48:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4382F765.4020707@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0511221026200.31192@skynet>

Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> 
>>>All of that said, I am not even sure we have a bit left in the page
>>>flags on smaller architectures :/.
>>
>>How about
>>
>>#define PG_checked               8      /* kill me in 2.5.<early>. */
>>
>>?
>>
>>At least PG_uncached isn't used on many architectures too, so could
>>be reused. I don't know why those that use it don't check VMAs instead.
>>
> 
> 
> PG_unchecked appears to be totally unused. It's only users are the macros
> that manipulate the bit and mm/page_alloc.c . It appears it has been a
> long time since it was used to it is a canditate for reuse.
> 
Considering memory hotplug, I don't want to resize bitmaps at hot-add/remove.
no bitmap is welcome :)

-- Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-22 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-15 16:49 [PATCH 0/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20 Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:49 ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 001_antidefrag_flags Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:49   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 23:00   ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 23:00     ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 23:04     ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-15 23:04       ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-16  1:36     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:36       ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-20 14:45       ` [Lhms-devel] " Paul Jackson
2005-11-20 14:45         ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:49   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 23:36   ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-15 23:36     ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16  1:43     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:43       ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:52       ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16  1:52         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16  2:07         ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  2:07           ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:13           ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-11-22 10:13             ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-11-22 10:19             ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:19               ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:22             ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-22 10:22               ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-22 10:35               ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:35                 ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:48                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2005-11-22 10:48                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-22 19:40                   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 19:40                     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 10:54                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-22 10:54                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-22 11:10                   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 11:10                     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 11:35             ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-22 11:35               ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 003_fragcore Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  2:35   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-16  2:35     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2005-11-16 10:42     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16 10:42       ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 004_percpu Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 23:24   ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 23:24     ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-16  1:37     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:37       ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 005_configurable Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 16:50   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 23:39   ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-15 23:39     ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16  1:47     ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:47       ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-15 22:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20 Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 22:54   ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-16  1:34   ` Mel Gorman
2005-11-16  1:34     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4382F765.4020707@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.