All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] Re: has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl
@ 2005-11-24 21:32 sophana
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: sophana @ 2005-11-24 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Andy Furniss wrote:

>
> Nothing to do with htb classes, though you are right about small 
> packets  being a pain - they typically use 2 x 53 byte atm cells.
>
> The patches make htb lookup the delay of one less than the aal5 length 
> in a table that is generated by a patched tc so the delay returned is 
> the delay of the packet when it is atm cells.

You are right. He is calculating the exact overhead of pppoa inside the 
kernel (not pppoe because pppoe is not the point of congestion). He also 
modified tc so that overhead can be tweaked in the script.

I know the exact atm rate of my adsl line. So it should be possible to 
make an exact scheduling.

The most important application is VOIP on low rate adsl uploads because 
VOIP packets are small.

I still don't understand why this is not included in the kernel and tc...

My problem is that I have a 2.6.x kernel and his patch is for 2.4.x kernel.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-11-24 21:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-24 21:32 [LARTC] Re: has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl sophana

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.