* [LARTC] Re: has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl
@ 2005-11-24 21:32 sophana
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: sophana @ 2005-11-24 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Andy Furniss wrote:
>
> Nothing to do with htb classes, though you are right about small
> packets being a pain - they typically use 2 x 53 byte atm cells.
>
> The patches make htb lookup the delay of one less than the aal5 length
> in a table that is generated by a patched tc so the delay returned is
> the delay of the packet when it is atm cells.
You are right. He is calculating the exact overhead of pppoa inside the
kernel (not pppoe because pppoe is not the point of congestion). He also
modified tc so that overhead can be tweaked in the script.
I know the exact atm rate of my adsl line. So it should be possible to
make an exact scheduling.
The most important application is VOIP on low rate adsl uploads because
VOIP packets are small.
I still don't understand why this is not included in the kernel and tc...
My problem is that I have a 2.6.x kernel and his patch is for 2.4.x kernel.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-11-24 21:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-24 21:32 [LARTC] Re: has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl sophana
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.