* RE: [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon?
@ 2006-01-03 18:35 Ian Pratt
2006-01-03 18:44 ` Matt Ayres
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2006-01-03 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Ayres, xen users mailing list, xen-devel; +Cc: ian.pratt
> I am noticing many bug fixes, code cleanups, and improvements
> being committed to -unstable over the past few weeks and
> little or no commits to 3.0-testing.
>
> Is a back port of some of these to 3.0-testing expected to
> happen soon?
We're not planning on backporting stuff into 3.0.0.x -- we'll stabilise
the tree and do a 3.0.1.0 release in maybe 2-4 weeks time.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon?
2006-01-03 18:35 [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon? Ian Pratt
@ 2006-01-03 18:44 ` Matt Ayres
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Ayres @ 2006-01-03 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Pratt; +Cc: xen-devel, xen users mailing list, ian.pratt
Ian Pratt wrote:
>> I am noticing many bug fixes, code cleanups, and improvements
>> being committed to -unstable over the past few weeks and
>> little or no commits to 3.0-testing.
>>
>> Is a back port of some of these to 3.0-testing expected to
>> happen soon?
>
> We're not planning on backporting stuff into 3.0.0.x -- we'll stabilise
> the tree and do a 3.0.1.0 release in maybe 2-4 weeks time.
>
Ian,
Isn't the 3.0-testing tree meant to for users who want to test new fixes
before a release is made and to accelerate and refine the QA process?
If there are no back ports before a release then there is no point to
a 3.0-testing tree.
Thank you,
Matt Ayres
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon?
@ 2006-01-03 19:50 Ian Pratt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2006-01-03 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Ayres; +Cc: xen-devel, xen users mailing list, ian.pratt
> Ian Pratt wrote:
> >> I am noticing many bug fixes, code cleanups, and
> improvements being
> >> committed to -unstable over the past few weeks and little or no
> >> commits to 3.0-testing.
> >>
> >> Is a back port of some of these to 3.0-testing expected to happen
> >> soon?
> >
> > We're not planning on backporting stuff into 3.0.0.x -- we'll
> > stabilise the tree and do a 3.0.1.0 release in maybe 2-4 weeks time.
>
> Isn't the 3.0-testing tree meant to for users who want to
> test new fixes
> before a release is made and to accelerate and refine the
> QA process?
> If there are no back ports before a release then there is
> no point to a 3.0-testing tree.
We're backporting *bug fixes* into 3.0-testing (which will be released
as 3.0.0.x), not new features.
At some point in the next few weeks we'll sweep -unstable into
3.0-testing and gear up for a 3.0.1 release.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-03 19:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-03 18:35 [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1 soon? Ian Pratt
2006-01-03 18:44 ` Matt Ayres
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-03 19:50 Ian Pratt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.