[Adeos-main] 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 vs. 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01

[Adeos-main] 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 vs. 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01

[Hannes Mayer]

Ciao Alexis!

Quick question:
I just had a quick view, but is the 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 backport
already based on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01 ?
(or on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-00 ?)

If the first one is the case, wouldn't it be better to name it
2.4.32-i386-1.1-01 ? Sure 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 would be missing
but people immediately get the idea that the API, the behaviour
is the same in the 2.6 version (and it also includes the
bug-fixes from 00 to 01).

Thanks, Happy New Year and best regards,
Hannes.

Re: [Adeos-main] 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 vs. 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01

[Alexis Berlemont]

Hi,

> Quick question:
> I just had a quick view, but is the 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 backport
> already based on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01 ?
> (or on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-00 ?)
>
> If the first one is the case, wouldn't it be better to name it
> 2.4.32-i386-1.1-01 ? Sure 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 would be missing
> but people immediately get the idea that the API, the behaviour
> is the same in the 2.6 version (and it also includes the
> bug-fixes from 00 to 01).

2.4.3*-r0 corresponds (uncorrectly) to 2.6.*r9. But just before New Year's 
Eve, Philippe informed me that he wanted to integrate Dmitry's patch himself 
in every branch and align release numbers. The point was to recover a xenomai 
svn stable as soon as possible (with all the modifications in every branch 
and architecture). 

So, I am not the most appropriate guy to answer you for the moment. Like you, 
I am trying to keep informed with the modifications.

Happy New Year too !

Alexis.