All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Race in new page migration code?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:01:22 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CCB262.9070304@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30601170029if0ed895le2c18b26eb7c6a42@mail.gmail.com>

Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>OK (either way is fine), but you should still drop the __isolate_lru_page
>>>nonsense and revert it like my patch does.
>>
>>Ok with me. Magnus: You needed the __isolate_lru_page for some other
>>purpose. Is that still the case?
> 
> 
> It made sense to have it broken out when it was used twice within
> vmscan.c, but now when the patch changed a lot and the function is
> used only once I guess the best thing is to inline it as Nick
> suggested. I will re-add it myself later on when I need it. Thanks.
> 
> / magnus
> 

I'm curious, what do you need it for?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Race in new page migration code?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:01:22 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CCB262.9070304@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30601170029if0ed895le2c18b26eb7c6a42@mail.gmail.com>

Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>OK (either way is fine), but you should still drop the __isolate_lru_page
>>>nonsense and revert it like my patch does.
>>
>>Ok with me. Magnus: You needed the __isolate_lru_page for some other
>>purpose. Is that still the case?
> 
> 
> It made sense to have it broken out when it was used twice within
> vmscan.c, but now when the patch changed a lot and the function is
> used only once I guess the best thing is to inline it as Nick
> suggested. I will re-add it myself later on when I need it. Thanks.
> 
> / magnus
> 

I'm curious, what do you need it for?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-17  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-14 15:55 Race in new page migration code? Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 15:55 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-14 18:01   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-14 18:19   ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 18:19     ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 18:58     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-14 18:58       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-15  5:28       ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-15  5:28         ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-16  6:54         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16  6:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16  7:44           ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-16  7:44             ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-17  8:29           ` Magnus Damm
2006-01-17  8:29             ` Magnus Damm
2006-01-17  9:01             ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-01-17  9:01               ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-17  9:22               ` Magnus Damm
2006-01-17  9:22                 ` Magnus Damm
2006-01-15  6:58       ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-15  6:58         ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-15 10:58       ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-15 10:58         ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16  6:51         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16  6:51           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16 12:32           ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 12:32             ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 15:47             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16 15:47               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16 16:06               ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 16:06                 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 16:10                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16 16:10                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-16 16:28                   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 16:28                     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-16 16:51                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 16:51                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 16:56                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-16 16:56                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-17  5:06                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17  5:06                           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 11:16                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-17 11:16                             ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-17 17:29             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 17:29               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 18:46               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-01-17 18:46                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-01-17 18:48                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 18:48                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 19:01               ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-17 19:01                 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-17 20:15                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 20:15                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-17 20:49                   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-17 20:49                     ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43CCB262.9070304@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.