All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>
To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:55:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D8FF16.40107@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cda58cb80601260831i61167787g@mail.gmail.com>



Franck wrote:

>>-march=mips32r2 is to allow the compiler to generate branch-likely
>>instructions -- they're deprecated for generic mips32 code but carry no
>>penalty on the 4K core. It will also cause the compiler's "4kc" pipeline
>>description to be used for instruction scheduling, instead of the
>>default "24kc", but that should only change the order of instructions
>>    
>>
>
>Do you mean that the code can be run faster when using -march=4ksd ?
>  
>

Yes, though the difference is likely to be small. The -march=4ksd option 
also enables the SmartMIPS ASE, but you've already done that explicitly 
with -msmartmips.

>  
>
>>and shouldn't really make a significant difference to the code size.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>yes but I have :(
>  
>

Then you'll have to have a look at the resulting disassembled code and 
figure what's changed. :)

Thinking about this in more detail:

1) Using -march=4ksd reduces the cost of a multiply by 1 instruction 
(from 5 to 4 cycles), so a few more constant multiplications, previously 
expanded into a sequence of shifts, adds and subs, may now be replaced 
by a shorter sequence of "li" and "mul" instructions.

2) Enabling branch-likely may allow some instructions to be moved into a 
branch delay slot which previously couldn't be -- but usually these are 
duplicates of the code at the original branch target, so have little 
effect on overall code size.

3) Using -march=mips32r2 with -O1 and above (but not -Os) enables 64-bit 
alignment of functions and frequently-used branch targets (e.g. loop 
headers); whereas -march=4ksc will not do that. This will add some 
additional "nops" to the code.

Nigel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-26 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-25  9:36 [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu Franck
2006-01-25 12:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 13:34   ` Franck
2006-01-25 14:11     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-25 14:14       ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 14:32         ` Franck
2006-01-25 15:04           ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 18:03             ` Franck
2006-01-25 18:15               ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  8:11                 ` Franck
2006-01-26  8:26                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  8:47                     ` Franck
2006-01-26  9:17                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  9:17                         ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 11:56                         ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:02                 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:23                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:23                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:29                     ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:51                     ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 16:31                       ` Franck
2006-01-26 16:53                         ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:53                           ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:55                         ` Nigel Stephens [this message]
2006-01-26 18:02                           ` Franck
2006-01-26 20:25                             ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27  9:03                               ` Franck
2006-01-27 10:13                                 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:13                                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:45                                   ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:31                                     ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 12:53                                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 12:53                                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 14:44                                       ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:30                                   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 13:45                                 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 14:54                                   ` Franck
2006-01-27 15:04                                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-27 15:39                                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 15:39                                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 17:32                                       ` Franck
2006-01-29 15:07                                         ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-30 13:08                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-30 14:31                                           ` Franck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43D8FF16.40107@mips.com \
    --to=nigel@mips.com \
    --cc=kevink@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.