From: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
To: Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:03:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cda58cb80601270103t1419117cq@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D93025.9040800@mips.com>
2006/1/26, Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>:
>
> You could, but why not stick with -march=4ksd if that's your CPU of
> choice? It appears to result in marginally smaller code even when using
> -Os, and should have (slightly) better performance than a generic
> mips32r2 kernel?
>
Just to avoid a new CPU_4KSD definition in the kernel code as
suggested by Kevin. Basically all mips32r2 specific code is the same
as 4ksd specific code (except the code that deals with SmartMIPS
extension). So it can use CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2 macro. But I was not
aware of -march=4ksd and -march=mips32r2 differences. Maybe now it is
needed to have a new CPU_4KSD definition ?
Thanks
--
Franck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-27 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-25 9:36 [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu Franck
2006-01-25 12:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 13:34 ` Franck
2006-01-25 14:11 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-25 14:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 14:32 ` Franck
2006-01-25 15:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 18:03 ` Franck
2006-01-25 18:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 8:11 ` Franck
2006-01-26 8:26 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 8:47 ` Franck
2006-01-26 9:17 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 9:17 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 11:56 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:02 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:23 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:23 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:29 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:51 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 16:31 ` Franck
2006-01-26 16:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:55 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 18:02 ` Franck
2006-01-26 20:25 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 9:03 ` Franck [this message]
2006-01-27 10:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:45 ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 12:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 12:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 14:44 ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 13:45 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 14:54 ` Franck
2006-01-27 15:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-27 15:39 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 15:39 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 17:32 ` Franck
2006-01-29 15:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-30 13:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-30 14:31 ` Franck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cda58cb80601270103t1419117cq@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=nigel@mips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.