From: Marco Cavallini <arm.linux@koansoftware.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:00:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <443A8F3B.7050005@koansoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427722615.20060410170041@varma-el.com>
> Pros:
> BDI - 10Mbit eth, Lauterbach - 100 Mbit.
> Lauterbach scalable and simply extendable, BDI - not.
Lauterbach is the best choiche for both Linux and WinCE targets.
Lauterbach have *excellent* support too.
> Cons:
> BDI support gnu toolchain natively (in GDB server mode),
> Lauterbach - not (sometime it parsing elf/dwarf correctly,
> sometime, usually in critical cases :), not).
> And you are know, hmm, strange Lauterbach price policy:
> price of BDI firmware for a new CPU target is approx. 1000 eur,
> for the Lauterbach - price of new device.
--
Marco Cavallini
==============================================================
Koan s.a.s. - Software Engineering
Linux and WinCE solutions for Embedded and Real-Time Software
Klinux : the embedded distribution for industrial applications
- Atmel AT91 ARM Third Party Consultant
- Intel PCA Developer Network Member
- Microsoft Windows Embedded Partner
Via Pascoli, 3 - 24121 Bergamo - ITALIA
http://www.koansoftware.com - http://www.klinux.org
==============================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 6:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12 7:54 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13 6:17 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13 6:43 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00 ` Marco Cavallini [this message]
2006-04-10 18:20 ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04 ` Andrey Volkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=443A8F3B.7050005@koansoftware.com \
--to=arm.linux@koansoftware.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.