All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Wadepohl <W.Wadepohl@indumat.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:06:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1fh0s$7oe$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060410153222.A513C353B3C@atlas.denx.de>

Wolfgang Denk schrieb:

> Another pro for the BDI: they have  *excellent*  support.  I  know  a
> couple  of vendors of hardware and tools etc. Some of them are really
> good, but Abatron beats them all.
This is also true for Lauterbach. We are working with Lauterbach for nearly 
10 years have experienced always excellent support.
Implementing a new RTOS support: no problem.

If you only use a linux based development, Abatron may fit. If you use 
different development systems, like Windows and Linux, Lauterbach is far 
better.

--
Sch?ne Gr??e aus Reutlingen

Wolfram Wadepohl
Forschung & Entwicklung

E&K AUTOMATION
Indumat GmbH & Co. KG

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-11  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32   ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17     ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04         ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11  6:06     ` Wolfram Wadepohl [this message]
2006-04-10 16:35   ` llandre
2006-04-10 17:58     ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10         ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41     ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12  7:54       ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07         ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13  6:17           ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13  6:43             ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00   ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20     ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04       ` Andrey Volkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='e1fh0s$7oe$1@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=w.wadepohl@indumat.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.