From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Checking page_count(page) in invalidate_complete_page
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:56:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45185E80.5000202@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060925141036.73f1e2b3.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I think invalidate_inode_pages2() is sufficiently different from (ie:
> stronger than) invalidate_inode_pages() to justify the addition of a new
> invalidate_complete_page2(), which skips the page refcount check.
Almost all of invalidate_complete_page() is the same in both cases. How
about using a boolean switch to determine whether the page_count is
honored or not?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-25 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4518333E.2060101@oracle.com>
2006-09-25 21:10 ` Checking page_count(page) in invalidate_complete_page Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 22:30 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-25 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 22:57 ` Steve Dickson
2006-09-25 23:14 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-25 22:40 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-25 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-25 22:50 ` Steve Dickson
2006-09-25 22:51 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-25 23:14 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-25 23:21 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-26 0:01 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-26 0:13 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-26 1:33 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-26 1:48 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-28 16:26 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-28 16:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 16:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 16:42 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-28 17:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-28 17:09 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-29 0:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-29 20:34 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-29 20:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-29 21:02 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-29 21:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-29 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-29 21:48 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-29 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-29 23:05 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-01 4:21 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-02 12:01 ` Steve Dickson
2006-10-02 13:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-10-02 16:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-02 17:02 ` Steve Dickson
2006-10-02 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-02 19:02 ` Steve Dickson
2006-10-03 2:14 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-03 4:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-10-03 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-03 18:50 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-03 19:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-10-03 19:21 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-03 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 19:29 ` Chuck Lever
2006-10-04 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 19:53 ` Steve Dickson
2006-09-28 16:41 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-26 6:25 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-26 13:12 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-27 4:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-27 8:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 8:39 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-27 16:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 15:54 ` Chuck Lever
2006-09-25 22:56 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45185E80.5000202@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.