From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:54:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4527CDCC.1080209@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610071142.26045.prakash@punnoor.de>
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Am Samstag 07 Oktober 2006 10:08 schrieb Robert Hancock:
>> I've been working on the patch for sata_nv ADMA support for nForce4 that
>
> Nice!
>
>> make the default 1). I only enabled ADMA on those chipsets and not
>> MCP51, MCP55 or MCP61 since that was all that the original NVIDIA
>> version did. I assume there was a reason for this, though maybe not.
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't work for me on MCP51 if I change GENERIC to ADMA. So
> I wonder whether MCP51 has ADMA mode or what needs to be done to get NCQ
> working. :-(
What happened when you tried it? It would be useful if you could change
the #undef in these lines:
53 #undef ATA_DEBUG /* debugging output */
54 #undef ATA_VERBOSE_DEBUG /* yet more debugging output */
in include/linux/libata.h to #define and rebuild and try it then, that
will spew out a bunch more output and I can see if any reasonable
looking values are showing up at all. I was capturing this output the
crude way, booting with vga=6 to get a smaller font and taking a picture
of the screen :-) Also, maybe post the lspci -v output from the SATA
controller..
If that doesn't provide any insight, maybe the docs Jeff has provide the
answer for whether or not the MCP5x/MCP61 controllers have the same
interface as the CK804/MCP04..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-07 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-07 8:08 [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Robert Hancock
2006-10-07 9:42 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-10-07 15:54 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2006-10-10 6:44 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10 6:44 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10 7:52 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-11-30 16:46 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-12-01 0:07 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-07 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-07 23:49 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-10 6:52 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10 6:52 ` Allen Martin
2006-10-11 5:07 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-11 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-13 3:17 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-13 8:04 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-17 3:34 ` [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4 Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 3:37 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17 4:24 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 16:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17 17:58 ` Roland Dreier
2006-10-17 20:54 ` Mark Lord
2006-10-16 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Mark Lord
2006-10-16 23:40 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 0:04 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4527CDCC.1080209@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakash@punnoor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.