All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Allen Martin <AMartin@nvidia.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, prakash@punnoor.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45354320.6030009@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaslhmu8mt.fsf@cisco.com>

Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Mark> I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields, such as
>     Mark> the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently
>     Mark> depending upon endianess.
> 
> I don't know of any gcc version that changes the order of struct
> fields.  You might be thinking of bitfields, which are laid out in an
> endian-dependent way.

Ack.  And also thinking about other compilers I work with,
which apparently are not so friendly.

You are correct -- I just verified it (again) for myself on x86 & PPC,
and the layout of u8 doesn't change.

Cheers!

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-17 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-07  8:08 [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Robert Hancock
2006-10-07  9:42 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-10-07 15:54   ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-10  6:44     ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10  6:44       ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10  7:52       ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-11-30 16:46       ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-12-01  0:07         ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-07 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-07 23:49   ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-10  6:52   ` Allen Martin
2006-10-10  6:52     ` Allen Martin
2006-10-11  5:07     ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-11 10:30       ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-13  3:17         ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-13  8:04           ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-17  3:34             ` [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4 Robert Hancock
2006-10-17  3:37               ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17  4:24                 ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17 16:22                   ` Mark Lord
2006-10-17 17:58                     ` Roland Dreier
2006-10-17 20:54                       ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-10-16 16:17           ` [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive Mark Lord
2006-10-16 23:40             ` Robert Hancock
2006-10-17  0:04               ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45354320.6030009@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=AMartin@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakash@punnoor.de \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.