All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* snd_seq: buffered vs. direct output of events
@ 2007-02-21 20:51 Gerald Grabner
  2007-02-22 11:04 ` Takashi Iwai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Grabner @ 2007-02-21 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alsa-devel

Hi there,

I'm wondering what the pros and cons of buffered vs. direct output of
sequencer events might be.

As far as I have found out, snd_seq_event_output_direct has the
advantage of not having to care about calling snd_seq_drain_output. On
the other hand, snd_seq_event_output allows the removal of scheduled
events via snd_seq_remove_events.

But I am sure that there are a number of other arguments...

Thx,
Gerald

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-22 11:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-21 20:51 snd_seq: buffered vs. direct output of events Gerald Grabner
2007-02-22 11:04 ` Takashi Iwai

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.