All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Shane <ibm-main@tpg.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	riel@redhat.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com, xemul@sw.ru,
	menage@google.com, devel@openvz.org, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller reclaim
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:43:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ED4CF7.7030501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173178212.4998.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>



Shane wrote:
> Anyone else have trouble fitting this patch ???.
> I see a later version today, but not markedly different from this
> mornings (Aus time). Initially I thought I had the first version, prior
> to Balbir's RSS controller V2 re-write, but apparently not.
> Kernel 2.6.20.1

Hi Shane,

I did post the same patch again today since the previous post
yesterday did not showup on LKML.  I have not changed the version
since it is the same patch.

Next time around i will explicitly mention that this is the same patch
posted again.

> Had to toss it away so I could do some base line testing - I'll redo the
> build and see where the mis-matches are.

Please let me know if so see any problem running the patch.  The
patches are against 2.6.20 only since dependent patches are at that level.

--Vaidy


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Shane <ibm-main@tpg.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	riel@redhat.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com, xemul@sw.ru,
	menage@google.com, devel@openvz.org, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller reclaim
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:43:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ED4CF7.7030501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173178212.4998.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>


Shane wrote:
> Anyone else have trouble fitting this patch ???.
> I see a later version today, but not markedly different from this
> mornings (Aus time). Initially I thought I had the first version, prior
> to Balbir's RSS controller V2 re-write, but apparently not.
> Kernel 2.6.20.1

Hi Shane,

I did post the same patch again today since the previous post
yesterday did not showup on LKML.  I have not changed the version
since it is the same patch.

Next time around i will explicitly mention that this is the same patch
posted again.

> Had to toss it away so I could do some base line testing - I'll redo the
> build and see where the mis-matches are.

Please let me know if so see any problem running the patch.  The
patches are against 2.6.20 only since dependent patches are at that level.

--Vaidy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-06 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-05 14:52 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache accounting and control subsystem (v1) Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-05 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller setup Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-05 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller accounting Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-05 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] Containers: Pagecache controller reclaim Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-06 10:50   ` [ckrm-tech] " Shane
2007-03-06 10:50     ` Shane
2007-03-06 11:13     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2007-03-06 11:13       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-07  9:03       ` Shane
2007-03-07  9:03         ` Shane
2007-03-07 11:58         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-07 11:58           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45ED4CF7.7030501@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=ibm-main@tpg.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@sw.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.