From: Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il> To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, ck@vds.kolivas.org, Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too? Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:55:21 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <45FCD449.60303@argo.co.il> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20070318052439.GT943@1wt.eu> Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 06:32:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> >>> One issue this raises is prioritizing users on a system, threads within >>> processes, jobs within users, etc. >>> >> Doing some "classing" even by just euid might be a good idea. It would >> actually catch X automatically most of the time, because the euid of the X >> server is likely to be root, so even for the "trivial" desktop example, it >> would kind of automatically mean that X would get about 50% of CPU time >> even if you have a hundred user clients, just because that's "fair" by >> euid. >> > > Warning: all these ideas seem interesting for desktop, but are definitely > not for servers. I found RSDL to be excellent on servers, compared to > mainline in which some services are starving under load. I can understand > that on the desktop people want some unfairness, and I like the pgrp idea > for instance. But this one will certainly fail on servers, or make the > admins get grey hair very soon. > I didn't suggest adding any unfairness! I suggested being fair by user/job/process instead of being fair by thread (which is actually unfair as it favors multi threaded processes over single threaded processes). > Maybe we're all discussing the problem because we have reached the point > where we need two types of schedulers : one for the desktop and one for > the servers. After all, this is already what is proposed with preempt, > it would make sense provided they share the same core and avoid ifdefs > or unused structure members. Maybe adding OPTIONAL unfairness to RSDL > would help some scenarios, but in any case it is important to retain > the default fairness it provides. > I hope not. I think that reducing the timeslice base, combined with renicing X all the way to hell should suffice. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-18 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 197+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-04 20:35 [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler Al Boldi
2007-03-04 21:49 ` Con Kolivas
[not found] ` <45EB45F7.3050208@simon.arlott.org.uk>
2007-03-04 22:27 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-05 18:29 ` Simon Arlott
2007-03-05 21:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 23:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-04 23:58 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-05 0:10 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-05 1:09 ` Gene Heskett
[not found] ` <200703050834.45712.a1426z@gawab.com>
[not found] ` <20070305060732.GQ30401@nysv.org>
2007-03-05 11:59 ` [ck] " Al Boldi
2007-03-05 12:29 ` Con Kolivas
[not found] ` <200703052123.01095.a1426z@gawab.com>
2007-03-05 22:10 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-06 8:42 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-06 15:15 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-11 18:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-11 21:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 22:12 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 4:42 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 4:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 11:26 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 12:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 14:14 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 14:58 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 16:37 ` michael chang
2007-03-12 17:41 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 18:05 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 18:47 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 18:58 ` Antonio Vargas
2007-03-19 10:47 ` Helge Hafting
2007-03-18 1:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-18 10:50 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-13 15:31 ` [PATCH] [RSDL-0.30] sched: rsdl improve latencies with differential nice Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 16:03 ` [PATCH] [RSDL-0.30] sched: rsdl improve latencies with differential nice -1 Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 16:08 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 20:58 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 23:08 ` RSDL development plans Con Kolivas
2007-03-16 12:25 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-16 13:40 ` RSDL v0.31 Con Kolivas
2007-03-16 15:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-16 21:13 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-16 22:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-16 23:05 ` [ck] " Dirk Schoebel
2007-03-17 4:24 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-03-17 5:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 13:56 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-03-18 19:37 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-18 19:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 22:45 ` Szonyi Calin
2007-03-19 2:27 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-19 6:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-19 6:59 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-17 6:26 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-03-17 7:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 7:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-17 7:29 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-03-17 11:48 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-17 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 7:44 ` David Lang
2007-03-17 8:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 14:09 ` [ck] " Mark Glines
2007-03-17 14:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 14:54 ` Mark Glines
2007-03-17 14:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 8:23 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-03-17 9:42 ` [patch] CFS scheduler: Completely Fair Scheduler / CONFIG_SCHED_FAIR Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 8:41 ` RSDL v0.31 Serge Belyshev
2007-03-17 9:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-17 9:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 10:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 12:05 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-17 13:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 17:03 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-17 17:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 18:23 ` [ck] " Kacper Wysocki
2007-03-17 18:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 13:58 ` michael chang
2007-03-17 20:55 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-18 6:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 6:47 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-18 7:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 7:22 ` [ck] " Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-18 7:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 8:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 8:20 ` jimmy bahuleyan
2007-03-18 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 9:57 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-18 13:57 ` Avuton Olrich
2007-03-19 20:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-20 10:19 ` jos poortvliet
2007-03-21 8:58 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-18 15:44 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-18 16:09 ` jos poortvliet
2007-03-19 16:07 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-19 16:26 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-19 16:36 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-19 16:43 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-20 3:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 6:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-20 8:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-21 14:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-21 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-21 17:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-22 7:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-22 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-22 9:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-22 9:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-22 22:03 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-22 22:50 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-23 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-23 5:59 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-23 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-23 12:17 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <20070321161147.54c7a727@localhost>
2007-03-21 17:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-22 4:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-22 7:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-20 9:03 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-03-20 12:31 ` Artur Skawina
2007-03-20 19:16 ` Artur Skawina
2007-03-21 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-21 10:43 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-28 23:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-29 7:10 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-29 7:34 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-20 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-20 18:08 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-21 8:22 ` Keith Duthie
2007-03-28 23:43 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-20 10:26 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-20 13:22 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-20 15:16 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-20 15:20 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-21 8:55 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-19 20:53 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-20 19:50 ` Artur Skawina
2007-03-21 4:15 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-21 17:24 ` Artur Skawina
2007-03-19 16:03 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-17 11:49 ` is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too? Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 12:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-17 12:23 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-17 17:31 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-17 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 12:43 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-17 16:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-18 3:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-18 2:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-18 3:20 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-03-18 5:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 10:58 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-17 12:15 ` jos poortvliet
2007-03-17 20:41 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-18 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-18 1:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-18 5:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-18 5:55 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2007-03-19 2:27 ` David Schwartz
2007-03-19 13:27 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-19 18:30 ` David Lang
2007-03-19 15:25 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-19 16:06 ` Helge Hafting
2007-03-19 16:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-18 6:09 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-18 6:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 7:35 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-19 21:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-18 6:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-18 6:54 ` [ck] " Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-03-18 7:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-18 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-18 5:00 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-17 15:13 ` RSDL v0.31 Mark Hahn
2007-03-17 17:22 ` Stephen Clark
2007-03-19 15:06 ` Chris Friesen
2007-03-17 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 11:07 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-17 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-17 13:44 ` jos poortvliet
2007-03-17 14:04 ` [ck] " Ed Tomlinson
2007-03-17 14:32 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-17 14:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-17 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-16 17:12 ` AshMilsted
2007-03-16 17:41 ` Gabriel C
2007-03-16 21:55 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-17 2:51 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-17 4:40 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-17 4:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-17 5:15 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-17 13:50 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-03-17 16:12 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-16 13:42 ` RSDL development plans Mike Galbraith
2007-03-16 13:59 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-16 14:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-14 9:13 ` [PATCH] [RSDL-0.30] sched: rsdl improve latencies with differential nice Mike Galbraith
2007-03-14 9:25 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-14 9:42 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45FCD449.60303@argo.co.il \
--to=avi@argo.co.il \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.