All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* other potentially deletable, dead stuff
@ 2007-04-20 23:19 Robert P. J. Day
  2007-04-21 12:30 ` Tilman Schmidt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-04-20 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List


  and while len is working on detaching APM and ACPI from legacy power
management, here's the short list of other stuff that is listed as on
its way to being dead, based on the contents of Kconfig files.  any of
this stuff candidates for removal, if not scheduling for removal?

  (note:  i made no effort to cull this list of entries that i know
folks are already aware of or might be working on, or stuff that we've
already established is *not* really obsolete.  it's just a list.)


config NET_CLS_POLICE
        bool "Traffic Policing (obsolete)"

config IP_NF_CONNTRACK_SUPPORT
        bool "Layer 3 Dependent Connection tracking (OBSOLETE)"

config IP6_NF_QUEUE
        tristate "IP6 Userspace queueing via NETLINK (OBSOLETE)"

config IP_NF_QUEUE
        tristate "IP Userspace queueing via NETLINK (OBSOLETE)"

config ARPD
        bool "IP: ARP daemon support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
        ...
        This code is experimental and also obsolete...

config BRIDGE_EBT_ULOG
        tristate "ebt: ulog support (OBSOLETE)"

config PCMCIA_IOCTL
        bool "PCMCIA control ioctl (obsolete)"

config SHAPER
        tristate "Traffic Shaper (OBSOLETE)"

config SUN_BPP
        tristate "Bidirectional parallel port support (OBSOLETE)"

config I2O_CONFIG_OLD_IOCTL
        bool "Enable ioctls (OBSOLETE)"

config MOXA_SMARTIO
        tristate "Moxa SmartIO support (OBSOLETE)"

config RAW_DRIVER
        tristate "RAW driver (/dev/raw/rawN) (OBSOLETE)"

config ISDN_I4L
        tristate "Old ISDN4Linux (obsolete)"

config MODE_TT
        bool "Tracing thread support (DEPRECATED)"
        ...
        This option controls whether tracing thread support is compiled
        into UML. This option is largely obsolete ...

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
  2007-04-20 23:19 other potentially deletable, dead stuff Robert P. J. Day
@ 2007-04-21 12:30 ` Tilman Schmidt
  2007-04-21 13:11   ` Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tilman Schmidt @ 2007-04-21 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day, Linux Kernel Mailing List, i4ldeveloper,
	Andrew Morton, Karsten Keil

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 794 bytes --]

Am 21.04.2007 01:19 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> [...] here's the short list of other stuff that is listed as on
> its way to being dead, based on the contents of Kconfig files.  any of
> this stuff candidates for removal, if not scheduling for removal?

[...]

> config ISDN_I4L
>         tristate "Old ISDN4Linux (obsolete)"

<message type=recorded>

The "obsolete" label on the ISDN_I4L Kconfig option is,
and has always been, incorrect.

isdn4linux is not obsolete.

isdn4linux is in active use, and there is no replacement.

Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression.

</message>

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                                  E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Wehrhausweg 66                                  Fax: +49 228 4299019
53227 Bonn
Germany


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
  2007-04-21 12:30 ` Tilman Schmidt
@ 2007-04-21 13:11   ` Robert P. J. Day
  2007-04-21 13:37     ` Tilman Schmidt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-04-21 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tilman Schmidt
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, i4ldeveloper, Andrew Morton,
	Karsten Keil

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote:

> Am 21.04.2007 01:19 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> > [...] here's the short list of other stuff that is listed as on
> > its way to being dead, based on the contents of Kconfig files.  any of
> > this stuff candidates for removal, if not scheduling for removal?
>
> [...]
>
> > config ISDN_I4L
> >         tristate "Old ISDN4Linux (obsolete)"
>
> <message type=recorded>
>
> The "obsolete" label on the ISDN_I4L Kconfig option is,
> and has always been, incorrect.
>
> isdn4linux is not obsolete.
>
> isdn4linux is in active use, and there is no replacement.
>
> Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression.

i know.  believe me, i *know that*, since i'm fairly sure it was my
observation that initially started that discussion about isdn4linux.
i did make it clear in that previous post that all i was doing was
listing stuff in the source tree that is currently marked with
"obsolete" or something like that, with no regard to any discussion
that's taken place about it recently.

all i was interested in was feedback along the lines of, "oh, yeah,
*that* feature is thoroughly dead and can be tossed," nothing more.

rday

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
  2007-04-21 13:11   ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2007-04-21 13:37     ` Tilman Schmidt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tilman Schmidt @ 2007-04-21 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, i4ldeveloper, Andrew Morton,
	Karsten Keil

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --]

Am 21.04.2007 15:11 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
[...]
>> Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression.
> 
> i know.  believe me, i *know that*, since i'm fairly sure it was my
> observation that initially started that discussion about isdn4linux.

Sure. I didn't want to suggest otherwise. Sorry if I did.

> i did make it clear in that previous post that all i was doing was
> listing stuff in the source tree that is currently marked with
> "obsolete" or something like that, with no regard to any discussion
> that's taken place about it recently.

Of course, and thanks for that. But I can't just let it stand
uncommented, can I? People might start believing isdn4linux *was*
obsolete because "it was on that list of obsolete items, and nobody
protested."

> all i was interested in was feedback along the lines of, "oh, yeah,
> *that* feature is thoroughly dead and can be tossed," nothing more.

Right. So please don't feel annoyed by my reply. Just take it as a
feedback of "*that* feature definitely isn't dead".

Thanks
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                                  E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-21 13:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-20 23:19 other potentially deletable, dead stuff Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-21 12:30 ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-04-21 13:11   ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-21 13:37     ` Tilman Schmidt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.