From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:29:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465CA950.403@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705292336050.11140@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 10 2007 16:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>>On May 10 2007 16:02, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>>>A lot ... as far as the filter table and sshcheck is concerned,
>>>>
>>>>iptables -N sshcheck;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m recent --name sshcheck --seconds 60 --update -j DROP;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m hashlimit --hashlimit-name sshcheck \
>>>> --hashlimit-mode srcip --hashlimit 4/min --hashlimit-burst 4 \
>>>> -j RETURN;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m recent --name sshcheck --set -j DROP;
>>>
>>>Did you get an "invalid size" message in the ringbuffer before the oops?
>>
>>Now that you mention it, yes:
>>
>>ip_tables: conntrack match: invalid size 80 != 72
>
>
> This is fixed in 2.6.21, thanks.
Yes, the hashlimit compat issue is. But the underlying problem still
persists, I'll send you a patch for testing soon.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:29:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <465CA950.403@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705292336050.11140@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 10 2007 16:05, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>>On May 10 2007 16:02, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>>>A lot ... as far as the filter table and sshcheck is concerned,
>>>>
>>>>iptables -N sshcheck;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m recent --name sshcheck --seconds 60 --update -j DROP;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m hashlimit --hashlimit-name sshcheck \
>>>> --hashlimit-mode srcip --hashlimit 4/min --hashlimit-burst 4 \
>>>> -j RETURN;
>>>>iptables -A sshcheck -m recent --name sshcheck --set -j DROP;
>>>
>>>Did you get an "invalid size" message in the ringbuffer before the oops?
>>
>>Now that you mention it, yes:
>>
>>ip_tables: conntrack match: invalid size 80 != 72
>
>
> This is fixed in 2.6.21, thanks.
Yes, the hashlimit compat issue is. But the underlying problem still
persists, I'll send you a patch for testing soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 6:27 iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 6:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 6:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 6:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 7:16 ` David Miller
2007-05-10 7:16 ` David Miller
2007-05-10 13:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 13:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 13:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 13:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 14:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 14:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 14:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 14:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 22:29 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-05-29 22:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 12:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 12:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 13:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 13:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 13:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 13:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 14:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 14:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 6:47 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-03 6:47 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-03 16:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 16:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 17:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 17:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 17:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 17:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 18:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 18:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-04 7:54 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-04 7:54 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-05 12:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 12:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:50 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-05 13:50 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-05-10 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=465CA950.403@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.