All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4665542F.9020607@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706041154.11187.dim@openvz.org>

Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> It's better, but I see the issue with iterate with compat_check_entry() calls.
> If it fails, some of target/matches' check_* functions are called, some not.
> Please, review my version of this patch.


You're right again, thanks. Patch applied.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:16:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4665542F.9020607@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706041154.11187.dim@openvz.org>

Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> It's better, but I see the issue with iterate with compat_check_entry() calls.
> If it fails, some of target/matches' check_* functions are called, some not.
> Please, review my version of this patch.


You're right again, thanks. Patch applied.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-05 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-10  6:27 iptables throws unknown error - suspecting 32/64 compat issue Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10  6:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10  6:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10  6:34   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10  7:16   ` David Miller
2007-05-10  7:16     ` David Miller
2007-05-10 13:20   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 13:20     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 13:24     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 13:24       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 14:02       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 14:02         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 14:05         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-10 14:05           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:36           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:36             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 22:29             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-29 22:29               ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 12:54               ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 12:54                 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 13:29                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 13:29                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 13:53                   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 13:53                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 14:25                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 14:25                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 14:43                   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 14:43                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03  6:47                 ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-03  6:47                   ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-03 16:57                   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 16:57                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 17:29                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 17:29                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 17:31                       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 17:31                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-03 18:11                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-03 18:11                           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-04  7:54                     ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-04  7:54                       ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-05 12:16                       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-06-05 12:16                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:32                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:32                           ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-05 13:50                           ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-06-05 13:50                             ` Dmitry Mishin
2007-05-10 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-10 12:58   ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4665542F.9020607@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=dim@openvz.org \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.