* wip-libcephfs rebase
[not found] <260303729.166.1372355254438.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
@ 2013-06-27 17:54 ` Matt W. Benjamin
2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matt W. Benjamin @ 2013-06-27 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel; +Cc: Sage Weil, aemerson, David Zafman, Ilya Storozhilov
Hi All,
Just to confirm what Adam and I are doing on this end, ie, this is our plan to rebase wip-libcephfs following wip-libcephfs-rebase.
* proceeding commit-wise on wip-libcephfs-rebase, mapping each change back to a commit in wip-libcephfs
** striking out anything marked reject in rebase
** striking out anything marked "whitespace"
*** (unless you want these)
** either striking out or motivating in commit message anything marked "why"
** updating commit messages of every commit which remains
*** with author, signed off by, SHAs of the source commit(s), updated commit message (background authors)
* test, fix, and rebase as necessary
* cherry-pick changes from Ilya
** adapt anything we propose to adjust in new commits
* rebase on head
* push to our Ceph repo for review/pull when ready
Matt
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: wip-libcephfs rebase
2013-06-27 17:54 ` wip-libcephfs rebase Matt W. Benjamin
@ 2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2013-06-27 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt W. Benjamin; +Cc: ceph-devel, aemerson, David Zafman, Ilya Storozhilov
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Just to confirm what Adam and I are doing on this end, ie, this is our plan to rebase wip-libcephfs following wip-libcephfs-rebase.
>
> * proceeding commit-wise on wip-libcephfs-rebase, mapping each change back to a commit in wip-libcephfs
I wouldn't worry about referencing the original commits unless it is
important to you guys (it isn't to me). Those commits won't appear in the
canonical ceph.git source tree anyway.
> ** striking out anything marked reject in rebase
> ** striking out anything marked "whitespace"
> *** (unless you want these)
We can keep the whitespace fixes, as long as they are in spearate patches
from real changes
> ** either striking out or motivating in commit message anything marked "why"
> ** updating commit messages of every commit which remains
> *** with author, signed off by, SHAs of the source commit(s), updated commit message (background authors)
> * test, fix, and rebase as necessary
> * cherry-pick changes from Ilya
> ** adapt anything we propose to adjust in new commits
> * rebase on head
> * push to our Ceph repo for review/pull when ready
Sounds good!
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-27 19:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <260303729.166.1372355254438.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
2013-06-27 17:54 ` wip-libcephfs rebase Matt W. Benjamin
2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.