* wip-libcephfs rebase [not found] <260303729.166.1372355254438.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> @ 2013-06-27 17:54 ` Matt W. Benjamin 2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Matt W. Benjamin @ 2013-06-27 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel; +Cc: Sage Weil, aemerson, David Zafman, Ilya Storozhilov Hi All, Just to confirm what Adam and I are doing on this end, ie, this is our plan to rebase wip-libcephfs following wip-libcephfs-rebase. * proceeding commit-wise on wip-libcephfs-rebase, mapping each change back to a commit in wip-libcephfs ** striking out anything marked reject in rebase ** striking out anything marked "whitespace" *** (unless you want these) ** either striking out or motivating in commit message anything marked "why" ** updating commit messages of every commit which remains *** with author, signed off by, SHAs of the source commit(s), updated commit message (background authors) * test, fix, and rebase as necessary * cherry-pick changes from Ilya ** adapt anything we propose to adjust in new commits * rebase on head * push to our Ceph repo for review/pull when ready Matt -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: wip-libcephfs rebase 2013-06-27 17:54 ` wip-libcephfs rebase Matt W. Benjamin @ 2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Sage Weil @ 2013-06-27 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt W. Benjamin; +Cc: ceph-devel, aemerson, David Zafman, Ilya Storozhilov On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > Just to confirm what Adam and I are doing on this end, ie, this is our plan to rebase wip-libcephfs following wip-libcephfs-rebase. > > * proceeding commit-wise on wip-libcephfs-rebase, mapping each change back to a commit in wip-libcephfs I wouldn't worry about referencing the original commits unless it is important to you guys (it isn't to me). Those commits won't appear in the canonical ceph.git source tree anyway. > ** striking out anything marked reject in rebase > ** striking out anything marked "whitespace" > *** (unless you want these) We can keep the whitespace fixes, as long as they are in spearate patches from real changes > ** either striking out or motivating in commit message anything marked "why" > ** updating commit messages of every commit which remains > *** with author, signed off by, SHAs of the source commit(s), updated commit message (background authors) > * test, fix, and rebase as necessary > * cherry-pick changes from Ilya > ** adapt anything we propose to adjust in new commits > * rebase on head > * push to our Ceph repo for review/pull when ready Sounds good! sage ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-27 19:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <260303729.166.1372355254438.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
2013-06-27 17:54 ` wip-libcephfs rebase Matt W. Benjamin
2013-06-27 19:48 ` Sage Weil
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.