All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	jbaron@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:17:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606230641.GA11592@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> The output has changed from a terribly wide table to an enormously 
>> long list (just the generic way the statistics code prints data). 
> 
> Sigh, why dont you _ask_ before doing such stuff?

A nice diffstat is always worth a try, isn't it?
And I see other reasons for code sharing.
Ah, and doing it has been actually quite simple once I had figured out
what the original code does. :-)

> It is a terribly wide table because that makes it easily greppable

If one looks for contentions of "xtime_lock" within my enormously long list,
they could issue:

    grep -e "xtime_lock contentions" data

and get

    xtime_lock contentions 0x17bd2 3327 account_ticks+0x96/0x184
    xtime_lock contentions other 0

for example.

So how is this worse?

> but still watchable in one chunk in a sufficiently zoomed out xterm.

I am wondering whether we really want to reject kernel patches on the basis of 
this reasoning, disregarding any other point why a patch might be helpful.

 > Please preserve this output format

I understand why everybody likes their format most. It's always made to measure.
Chosing a different - or common - format didn't happen in bad faith.

Made to measure file format doesn't work well once we start abstracting out this 
functionality. And I feel that was expected too much of a low level kernel ABI 
piece.

I would like to add that usuability doesn't necessarily suffer if statistics for 
some brand new gadget look somewhat familiar and similar to other statistics one 
  has encountered earlier.

>, quite some work went into it - NACK :-(

Considering the amount of code.. ;-)    I am sorry.

But seriously, did you consider using some user space tool or script to
format this stuff the way you like it - similar to the way the powertop tool
reshuffles timer_stats data found in a proc file, for example?

The format of an enormously long list has been thought out keeping this 
particular requirement in mind.


	Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-07  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-06 21:34 [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  0:17   ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-06-07  4:40     ` Bill Huey
2007-06-07  7:03       ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:30         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  8:56           ` Bill Huey
2007-06-11 11:26             ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 16:27           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  6:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07  6:59       ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08 16:07           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07  0:21   ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:00   ` Martin Peschke
     [not found]     ` <1181322460.5728.2.camel@lappy>
     [not found]       ` <46698F7F.4090407@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-08 17:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:37           ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 17:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-11 10:31               ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:13   ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07  8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 10:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 12:20   ` Martin Peschke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46674EA9.9090601@de.ibm.com \
    --to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.