From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, billh@gnuppy.monkey.org, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:13:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46698E50.6030108@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1181202683.7348.220.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 23:34 +0200, Martin Peschke wrote:
>
>> +struct statistic_info lock_stat_info[_LOCK_STAT_NUMBER] = {
>> + [LOCK_STAT_CONT] = {
>> + .name = "contentions",
>> + .x_unit = "instruction_pointer",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=sparse entries=4",
>> + .flags = STATISTIC_FLAGS_LABEL,
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_WAIT_READ] = {
>> + .name = "wait_read",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_WAIT_WRITE] = {
>> + .name = "wait_write",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_HOLD_READ] = {
>> + .name = "hold_read",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> + },
>> + [LOCK_STAT_HOLD_WRITE] = {
>> + .name = "hold_write",
>> + .x_unit = "nanoseconds",
>> + .y_unit = "occurrence",
>> + .defaults = "type=utilisation",
>> }
>> };
>
> You're parsing strings in-kernel to setup data structures?
Might be surprising (or revolting?)... but, yes, I do.
.defaults reflects the developers opinion on the way of data
accumululation that might make most sense in most cases.
The current implementation of lib/statistic.c allows users to change
setting that we see in .defaults. If one needs to track more than
4 contention points, for example, then they can change this limit by
passing "entries=4" to the user interface. So there is some parsing
code anyway. Passing default setting in a similar fashion has just been
convenient for the developer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-08 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 21:34 [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:17 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 4:40 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-07 7:03 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 8:56 ` Bill Huey
2007-06-11 11:26 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 16:27 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 6:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 6:59 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08 16:07 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 0:21 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:00 ` Martin Peschke
[not found] ` <1181322460.5728.2.camel@lappy>
[not found] ` <46698F7F.4090407@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-08 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:37 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-08 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-11 10:31 ` Martin Peschke
2007-06-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-08 17:13 ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-06-07 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-07 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 12:20 ` Martin Peschke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46698E50.6030108@de.ibm.com \
--to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.